Anonymous ID: c481dc Sept. 13, 2018, 9:09 a.m. No.3006942   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3006855

I posted the proof, dumbass. You didn't really want to see the proof or you would have gone and read all the articles/connections and you wouldn't have made this RETARDED shill post. But of course, your only POINT for being here is these retarded SHILL posts. We see you, we know what you are. You fool no one.

Anonymous ID: c481dc Sept. 13, 2018, 9:30 a.m. No.3007156   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7183

>>3007051

A similar idea occurred to me โ€” this could be a journalist who cannot report this in the public domain themselves (think million bottles of water in PR and how the story came out). So they are dropping the photos here knowing anons can connect the dots and build the story accordingly. And THEN, as we are slowly seeing in mainstream media, they are reporting that 'social websites are all abuzz withโ€ฆ' - and that is how things are being exposed. Something to consider.

Anonymous ID: c481dc Sept. 13, 2018, 9:38 a.m. No.3007238   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3007068

This. It has been apparent for a while now that there is a very distinct cadence to all of this. It took years to formulate, and I think that all variables and factors were taken into consideration. It really IS a movie in the sense that most of it is a foregone conclusion, or the events have happened before they are publicly revealed. I do not believe that true 'anons' are frustrated or posting any of those 'why is muh plan taking so long?' posts. We understand that there re reasons for each thing that Q posts/requests โ€” it can just take a little while for those reasons to be revealed or to be come apparent. Memes come to mind -

Anonymous ID: c481dc Sept. 13, 2018, 9:40 a.m. No.3007257   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3007084

I don't church. But it isn't difficult to see what is in the Vatican. Not difficult at all. Pair that with the fact that the Rothschilds basically own it (easily proven, story is in public domain) โ€” that's about how I would know, I reckon.