Was just watching a GC video.
https:// youtu.be/OWIGLkjR_aM
He made a rather powerful implication at 2:00 through about 3:00. Someone's trying to reclaim what they think is theirs, is it? Or are they just jumping to a conclusion? Is this what was meant when you're telling us it's worse than we thought? But then, if 44 was actually born where his brother says he was, then that would explain the fealty to a foreign monarch.