>>304925

>>305034

(1) I'm the OP on this one, and as yours seems the most sincere response I'll reply to it. First, you did what most others are unable, or don't want, to do. You differentiated between patriotic Jews and other groups. The person I originally responded to preferred to the second grade approach and lumped all the groups he isolated as if they're all homogenous (and 'bad'). To address your points...other countries, though not a majority, allow dual-citizenship. My personal preference would be to have some form of national referendum on the topic, and I would accept whatever policy the country felt best, granted it applied across the board and no other forms of dual citizenship would be permitted either, if that's the choice. I really only brought it up to reinforce that the issue is usually only raised when it applies to American Jews with dual citizenship with Israel. And though I would agree that, though there are plenty from that group I strongly dislike (and who in my opinion advocate for policies that are not in the best interest of the country), there are also Jews with dual-citizenship who are strongly fighting for this country and hold its interest as superior to any other. They do, however, also have a pride in their Jewish heritage and, to some, it translates into a fondness for Israel. With that said, when do you ever hear anyone discuss the dual-citizenship of those with other countries? You don't, yet there are examples to be found of those persons acting in another country's interest before America's, but Jew-hatred covers for why it's never discussed. As to the Rothschild family. First, I think they are the lowest of the low, the vilest of the vile, and I truly don't think of them as Jewish. I think they are 'elitists," first and foremost. I strongly suspect most are probably sociopaths/psychopaths, and care only for themselves and other globalist elites, with the rest of humanity viewed solely as a resource to exploit. Though they proclaim a rich Jewish heritage etc., I would strongly doubt they would give a dying man a glass of water, though charity and live of others is strongly encouraged in Judaism, in fact, it's expected. By the way, it was my hope that Captain Green's mission (i.e. that unfortunate event in the sky above the former Roth UK estate) was reported as having been a success. Nevertheless, Ido find it interesting that since then, Jacob, a previously public personality, has been rather absent of late...so who really knows? Regardless, I take great comfort in believing their family | ++ | shall never return to the lifestyle they once enjoyed. "LdR, no use in running, WE can hear you breathing!"

Cont...

>>304925

>>305034

(2) As to usury. I'll simply remind you that, historically, engaging in its practice was, by Royal/religious proclamation almost the only 'trade' Jews were allowed to do, as it was viewed as too sinful and unholy for others. With that said, by modernity, things changed and I would note that the two 'minimum payment, interest only' charges I need to make within the next two days are owed to banks owned by wasps, Carlyle Style groups, and old Anglo-Saxon monied families. ChaseManhattan/J.P. Morgan/Bank of America/Citigroup/Discover what have you, are not, contrary to popular belief, majority owned Jewish enterprises. I too, owing lifetimes of debt from school, would prefer a world without usury and interest, so perhaps it's an area where we, in the West, can find common ground with the Islamic community, which forbids it. Lastly, as to the Mossad. When every country is ready to meet at the table of brotherly love, share all nation-secrets and fully disarm, then perhaps Israel, like every other country, might be willing to shed the appendix responsible for committing some acts which some might find distasteful, but which are primarily committed, or should be, as acts of national self-preservation. There's plenty of room to argue if certain events attributed to them were 'wrong.' However, with that said, why is the same debate not being advocated when it applies to the CIA, FSB (KGB), MI5/MI6, DGSE (France) et al? Though some here may want to believe the hand of Mossad is responsible for every false flag ever committed, the truth is far more complex. Why only discuss the Mossad? And have they not been credited with involvement in some things which later proved beneficial to the lives of US troops and personnel? When Israel bombed Saddam Hussein's nuclear facility in Osirak, Iraq in 1981, much of the pre-strike Intel was gained from Mossad, and it meant that, years later, American/coalition war planners didn't have to worry about a nuclear attack by Saddam when the American generals (I.e. Norman Swartkopf) were placing hundreds of thousands of troops in the mid-east during the Gulf-War. Though it may sound trite, the United States has no greater ally when it comes to the acquisition of intelligence for that region, than can be found in Israel. Countless lives have been saved and terrorist attacks against our interests thwarted and the Mossad, above all, deserves much of the credit. My point isn't to defend this or that. There's a place for debate on all of it. I was simply responding to, what I believe, is a self-defeating (and ignorant), expression of support for President Trump, but written in such a juvenile fashion it only dismisses, and trivializes, work patriotic Jews are doing (his name was Seth Rich), while simultaneously feeding into the left's narrative that MAGA is nothing but a racist ideology yearning, as they say, to "Make America White Again." On this I'm certain...what the original anon wrote, and what I was originally replying to, was ignorant, childish and self-defeating.