>>3123804

>>3123882

Whether the NYT report is factually true or not is actually beside the point – what we should zero in on is the reason (((they))) are leaking this particular narrative.

They see the writing on the wall – they know RR is about to be fired or otherwise pushed out. So they're trying to shift the optics on this to make it look like Trump is merely reacting to the NYT story (and solidify RR's place as a hero/martyr to the Resistance movement) INSTEAD OF the wrongdoing that is about to come out with the document declassifications.

>>3124102

>>3124134

Wow, this analysis seems very much to have been validated by Q's latest post:

>>>/patriotsfight/281

They're baiting him. Trump's not stupid enough to take the bait.

Even if he doesn't take the bait, though, they're going to attempt to use this to shift the optics around the RR firing away from the declassified wrongdoing and toward the supposed NYT scoop.

So if Horowitz dropping the unredacted documents has to wait until after the K confirmation process is completed, so much the better.

>>3124264

Maybe. Or maybe he's already given them enough rope to hang themselves, and there's really no way out of the trap for them.

>>3124331

I'll be okay if that little factoid stays in the proportion of truth that doesn't get fully shared…

>>3124403

If you believe the essential structure that Q has repeatedly laid out, it's:

K confirmation declas > RR fucked > everything else

To the extent this is true, and to the extent K confirmation hasn't happened yet, anything Trump says about declas in the interim is simply "part of the show."

And look at what he's actually said. He's revealing that at least 2 "allies" are concerned about the truth bomb they're about to get whacked with. This in itself is big news, and important. And he's also made it explicit that the declas is going to be coming through Horowitz rather than through RR's gang.

All of this is contributes to the narrative framework that is being built up to support what is about to happen.