>>3124484

Think logically. Releasing the enemies plans to your own foot soldiers, so they can counteract it does not have a downside.

In fact, wonder what someone posting "here's what Q said the msm was going to talk about today" would do for optics and red pilling.

If Q "sees all", it doesn't matter if they switch communication channels, right? Imagine how quick it would destroy msm in its entirety if Q did that for 10 days in a row.

Logically, Q doesn't "see all". Which I don't mind, but don't piss on my boots, and tell me it's raining.

>>3124799

If they are monitoring these boards, as Q has assured as many times, they already know the 4 a.m. talking points are comped.

Don't you understand? If they can't coordinate, what are they going to report? Think it through. What general wouldn't capitalize on knowing the enemies plans every day?

I'm not dismissing what Q is doing, just that Q doesn't "see all". How do you monitor someone not carrying or communicating with electrical devices, and driving a vehicle that doesn't have onstar? Has no one in the cabal thought of homing pigeons? Couriers? Ppt laser communications?

Or, put another way… Why, when I leave, with no way to be tracked electronically, is the next day always very, very interesting? (That last sentence wasn't for you, anon.)