Anonymous ID: c54212 Sept. 23, 2018, 6:15 p.m. No.3158072   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3157925 pb

kek

I guess they didn't use Strzok for the forgery.

>>3157871 pb

Not against you , anon.

nor any anon

>>3157226 pb

^^^Meant the comment for this one ^^^

>>3157562

She's said to recruit for the C-A at Stanford. In a Dept. founded by MkUltra researcher intocreating mind controlled assassins.

So does that mean she doesn't teach classes there?

Anonymous ID: c54212 Sept. 23, 2018, 6:21 p.m. No.3158187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8210

>>3157989

>https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-09-20%20Feinstein%20to%20Grassley%20-%20July%2030%20Letter%20from%20Ford.pdf

Didn't Feinstein ask that the letter be kept confidential?

Anonymous ID: c54212 Sept. 23, 2018, 6:28 p.m. No.3158301   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3158212

Looks like it's trying to appear as a "defective scan" But why only one line.

If a scan acts up like that it's not just for one line.

Also, Yes the Font is different.

The letters are stretched lenghtwise - is that to attempt to obscure the fact it's [Kavanaugh's name] is in a different style font?

Bad forgery should've gotten Strozk.

No wonder Feinstein didn't want it released.

Is she senile? What gives?

She's 80. Maybe someone set up the shitty forgery. And her eyes are too weak to see it?