Creating a thread to gather feedback on how the General thread should be formatted.

What should we include/not include?

Any sections to add/remove?

How is the current version?

Also what rules should Bakers adhere to before delivering the bread?

All feedback is greatly appreciated by new and old Bakers alike.

Copied from >>2562

Below is my conceptualization for what future breads/doughs should be made of. Thoughts anyone?

-Fun subject fields

-Link to dedicated FAQ thread or pastebin (I will help work on this, I'm a writefag. It will explain the basics clearly and concisely in case anyone needs to get caught up.)

-Link to dedicated links thread with all kinds of links and explanations for them, including archives

-Select direct off-site links - only the most useful and relevant at that general point in time (not sure what, IMO trumptwitterachive.com and qcodefag.github.io/ should be there, and the spreadsheet, and say, 2, others) w/ minimal explanation.

-A word of encouragement, and a reminder: We are the calm before, during, and after the storm. We are all researchers in a collaborative online workspace.

-A word of guidance: eg, right now we should be focused on authenticating Q's posts; then, a reasonable list of alternative leads.

-Brief baking instructions, maybe?

-Direct links to latest Q posts and up-to-date map/authentication graphic - possibly in second, follow up post

THAT'S IT.

IN MORE OR LESS THAT ORDER.

STREAMLINED.

SLEEK.

FUNCTIONAL.

PROFESSIONAL.

Copied from >>3141

Mybe I'm offtopic, but I think we should adopt a STRICT policy about derailing-monopolyzing the General thread.

I believe it's impossible to make sense of anything when there are hundreds of posts about "the evil Pope" or adenochrome or Oprah or whatever. People interested in one topic should be addressed to make their own thread, or face a ban. Most of them are shills anyway.

I know this is not a good chan policy, but this is a working board. We are already late on making the map and understanding the Q code, and I think all the derailing is the culprit.

Hope BO will do something.

Copied from >>2306

BREAD/DOUGH TEMPLATE

We are the calm before, during, and after the storm. We are researchers collaborating in an online workspace. We serve at the pleasure of the President of the United States. This is not a joke. Feel proud.

Present Lead: Review Q-posts and POTUS-tweets, look for timestamp or keyword markers, compile confirmations list; produce authentication maps.

(As determined by consistent concensus of meaning of recent-ish Q-crumbs)

Other Leads: [insert short summary of a topic, like Loop Capital, here].

(As determined by somewhat lesser degrees of consistency and consensus, maybe even by individual request, at Baker's discretion)

FAQ: [link to FAQ]

(I will help writefag it, thread or pastebin whichever works better. I'm unfamiliar w/ pastebin so would prefer to do thread, also threadgoers could help refine FAQ; yet I'm not sure thread-format fit for the overall purpose of FAQ. Suggestions?)

Links: [link to dedicated links thread w/ all former dough's links not found here]

Quick Access

qcodefag.github.io

trumptwitterachive.com

[insert site TBD here]

[insert site TBD here]

[insert site TBD here]

(Links added here not by request but by consistent group consensus over multiple threads, and not to exceed a maximum of 10 - some may need to be replaced eventually)

Latest Q-posts: >>>/thegreatawakening/

[insert links to latest Q-posts here]

Q Maps: [links to grand Q-maps, all 4, latest 8]

(I could use help assembling these. Ideas for long-term hosting format - image attach, threads, offsite archives?)

Authentication Maps: [links or images of best authentication maps available, and eventually grand maps, as decided by group discussion/consensus or Q verification (ask and you shall receive)]