Many times.
Go back.
Lurk moar.
>>331807
He (they) shifted narrative tone as a natural development of the psyop. Over time, you can see the evolution of the op responding to changing conditions in the field and major pieces being played over a wide board. As feedback from halfchan informed the director of the op what elements of the drops gained the most traction, they (he) tailored the manner and subject of the drops. Also, counterintel to avoid sniffers of opponent agencies required a keyword-neutral comm to avoid premature detection and counter.
Analystanon
I'm terribly curious to see what the contingency plans looked like for this op. There's so much room for individual actors to have an effect on the course of play that they had to have overlapping contingencies for everything. And make some shit up on the fly. That requires both foresight and creativity. Whoever is bossing this is a bad-ass.
In the final analysis, it's unimportant precisely who or what P is. Relieving them of the methods-of-control through withering attacks from a multitude of direction has crippled the control mechanisms the cabal has used, probably permanently. That is more important than who they are: denying them control. That means going after their resources, their freedom, their networks, and cutting off their rat-lines. Ensuring that they either face justice here or the assassin's bullet in whatever foreign hole they think they're safe in.
P is the enemy. Removing P from being able to exert control is the operation. Doing so in a way that eliminates the cabal's ability to recover is a secondary, but equally important, factor. Sure, it's nice to think of this like a Bond villain, where a bullet can end the evil plot, but shit doesn't quite work like that in the real world.
The cabal is like kudzu. The only way to kill it is to eliminate every root and branch. And then burn the ground it grew in.