>>3411671

Felt this was notable

JFK's birthday is May 29 (529JK)

He was born in '17

POTUS said JohnJohn sending him a letter about the loss of his (Trump's0 father "must have been one of the last things he did."

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/10/08/trump.transcript/

>>3413092

Is this honestly an answer?

"If you only knew who you were talking to"

>>3413129

Fine, but what does that mean? Gen Mattis? I don't think so. It has to be someone … of "interest"

>>3413149

exactly.

would be nice to know either way to stop digging & leave certain paths alone

regardless, there is some kind of connection with the presidencies of jfk and trump

>>3413183

i don't disagree. but, we all know trump is part of q. so why say "if you only knew…"?

leaves one to think.

jfk jr (or anyone in that 'position' (deceased)) would fit pretty well

>>3413219

please stop shilling and trying to divide

>>3413351

sorry, there is a connection between trump and jfk

jfk was a legitimate president

the great awakening is the justice finally sought and met for what happened, and a righting of america to where it was going before the cabal took over

whatever you are concernfagging about is nonsense

and no, you are not doing the opposite of dividing, you're just complaining and not making sense

>>3413431

>>>3413403 (You)

>do you even know what you're responding about?

uh, yes?

i bring up jfk and you go off the deep (state) end

sorry but i will CONTINUE to bring up jfk here