Then why are you here? Take a second to just think logically. Have you ever had plans interrupted because other events get in the way? Have you ever been late to a function or couldn't make it for various reasons? Have you ever exercised a contingency plan?
Q doesn't predict the future. Q executes, or is privy to, a plan. Sometimes, that plan works wonderfully. Sometimes, it gets interrupted. No matter what, however, the plan continues as best as it can. Anons know this, and all the demotivational shilling in the world isn't going to sway the super-massive "I told you so" that's coming for you guys later on.
>and so far NO ONE has even TRIED to attack that argument…
It does you no good to know who exactly Q is. What this movement has done is teach you to think for yourself. What Q proofs are you favorites? If you don't have any, then you haven't been paying attention, or you are a shill shilling. Did you even read my post that you linked about plans? No; you didn't. That's OK, though, because you are a shill. Shilling.
>Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 2af222 No.1693998 📁
>Jun 10 2018 22:18:31 (EST)
> Anonymous ID: dac787 No.1693990 📁
> Jun 10 2018 22:17:43 (EST)
> Thank you for guarding POTUS, Erik.
>>>1693990
>Not POTUS.
>Q
Question for you. Why do you think it's taking so long for the case against the Trump Foundation to proceed? I mean, we already have Cohen "confessing" to "crimes", yes? Who's prosecuting that case? What evidence did they obtain from the Cohen raids?
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1215291.html#1215845
>Cohen raid by FBI?
>Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels?
>SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info?
>RR signed off?
>What other docs were collected?
>How many places raided?
>Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels?
>Think logically.
>How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
>Who has everything?
>Methods which info collected/ obtained?
>Admissible in the court of law?
>Insert Rudy.
>First public statement.
>“It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.”
>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/rudy-to-rescue-giuliani-vows-to-wrap-up-mueller-probe.html
>Think resignations.
>Who has the POWER?
>If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign?
>Why are we here?
>Public forum.
>World watching.
>Sharing of intel to bad actors?
>Purpose?
>Not confirming SC is on /team/.
>Question everything.
>Timing important.
>Planned?
>Q
Exactly. Post midterms.
This is a boom if I've ever seen one. Here's another tweet in that regard:
https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1050538165583278080
The Dems allowed the Senate to confirm multiple judges just so they could get a recess. They've given up. They have nothing until midterms.
Everyone that died in the limo was probably well (((connected))), too. Think about it.
Re-Read Crumbs:
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: ea50a4 No.2014158 📁
Jul 3 2018 13:49:15 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 15bd50 No.2013625 📁
Jul 3 2018 13:00:02 (EST)
anons lawfag here
Re awan
anons already figured this out by i can add that i have suspected for some time that the state charges were just a delay tactic until the main indictments are unsealed
it is also possible or even likely given the way they treated awan that he will be a prosecution witness
since they would have never let him wander otherwise
lots more winning in store
im enjoying the movie!
>>2013625
Matters of National Security.
https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-2054-synopsis-classified-information-procedures-act-cipa📁
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 27f5c8 No.2012087 📁
Jul 3 2018 10:59:37 (EST)
96DD9F4B-7B96-4886-B93E-A0426BE18CF1.jpeg
⬇
Logical thinking.
Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?
The result today is re: BANK FRAUD.
See last.
Connect.
The SWAMP is being DRAINED.
Q