Wise Anon is wise.
AND kind!
The burden of proof is on you, Anon.
"Prove them false" is some bizarro thinking.
It makes no sense!
sigh
I believe this is Peter Strzok's wife. There. Are you happy now?
It's already been dug pretty thoroughly, hasn't it?
Sure, there's value in revisiting a thing.
Anyway. This is for you:
Nah.
This is not how to prove anything. Why?
So many assumptions. Assumptions on top of assumptions. Assumptions humping each other non-stop and making cute, little, assumption-lets!
As far as an argument goes, that approach neither proves nor disproves. It's just words.
It does prove an ability to think creatively, though! And that's worth something. :)
Meh, I dunno.
Believe it or not, when it comes to maintaining licensure, etc. that was obtained prior to a marriage, life is much easier if a woman just keeps her maiden name. Or hyphenates it and uses the maiden name for professional purposes and uses the hyphenate for personal/legal purposes.
Why it's so complicated is beyond me - I just know that it is what it is.
I'll look at Carlin in a minute, yet am immediately reminded of Mitch McConnell and Elaine Chao.
They have a cozy relationship with Chinese shipping and container companies, don't they?
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/05/mitch-mcconnell-elaine-chao-offshore-paradise-papers/
Anything involving Erdogan is reasonably suspicious.