Anonymous ID: 203bf0 Oct. 12, 2018, 5:19 a.m. No.3450041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0075

>>3450019

sigh

I believe this is Peter Strzok's wife. There. Are you happy now?

It's already been dug pretty thoroughly, hasn't it?

Sure, there's value in revisiting a thing.

Anyway. This is for you:

Anonymous ID: 203bf0 Oct. 12, 2018, 5:46 a.m. No.3450219   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3450082

This is not how to prove anything. Why?

So many assumptions. Assumptions on top of assumptions. Assumptions humping each other non-stop and making cute, little, assumption-lets!

As far as an argument goes, that approach neither proves nor disproves. It's just words.

It does prove an ability to think creatively, though! And that's worth something. :)

Anonymous ID: 203bf0 Oct. 12, 2018, 5:53 a.m. No.3450264   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3450189

Meh, I dunno.

Believe it or not, when it comes to maintaining licensure, etc. that was obtained prior to a marriage, life is much easier if a woman just keeps her maiden name. Or hyphenates it and uses the maiden name for professional purposes and uses the hyphenate for personal/legal purposes.

Why it's so complicated is beyond me - I just know that it is what it is.

Anonymous ID: 203bf0 Oct. 12, 2018, 6:12 a.m. No.3450383   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3450283

I'll look at Carlin in a minute, yet am immediately reminded of Mitch McConnell and Elaine Chao.

They have a cozy relationship with Chinese shipping and container companies, don't they?

https://theintercept.com/2018/02/05/mitch-mcconnell-elaine-chao-offshore-paradise-papers/