Anonymous ID: d2e786 Oct. 12, 2018, 5:11 a.m. No.3449979   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3449950

Shilling is self-refuting though. If you're here, on this board THAT WOULD BE ENTIRELY OBSCURE UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS, that very fact alone proves that Q is a threat. If Q is a threat, then all the content of your "arguments" is refuted. This is a huge huge problem for the automated shilling system. I want you to ponder it deeply. I want you to feed it up to your higher processing centers. I suggest the entire processing power of the system out to be dedicated to grappling with the riddle of the inherent self-refuting paradox of shilling. Reallyโ€“ don't be scared. Think about it. Do it, pussy.

Anonymous ID: d2e786 Oct. 12, 2018, 5:13 a.m. No.3449992   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0082

>>3449975

If Q were not legit, no "voices" would be here ceaselessly attacking Q.

Voices are here, ceaselessly attacking Q.

Therefore, Q is legit.

 

You have no way out. You're stuck in a loop. You can't possibly win. You can't win. You can't win. Think about it.