>>348499 (x-thread)

>don't rewrite the constitution, preserve the case law underpinning it

please see:

>>130638 (Q post)

>Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged.

>Lawless.

>Think logically.

every case from the present walking back to the beginning of the corruption - however far back it may be - SHOULD be challenged. the wood used to shore up the house is rotten, and at best only the corner posts are still solid. i, for one, welcome a new house being built using the knowledge we have now, but i am not the only resident and know it would be an extraordinarily large task

>inb4 just move to poland, bro!

>>348816

the problem though, is the case law that anon referenced. judges legislate from the bench now and the cases that half of the shit is based on are fucked

>arrest them all RIGHT MEOW

look, it's just like Q said here:

>>343304

think "samson option" even if in a non-nuclear case. the options are to try to purge them all, in which case they retaliate with what few failsafes they have in place, or to strike a deal with those who remain who are willing to play ball. keeping some things private and striking a deal is the least damaging option. the most corrupt, most evil still gets taken out. the moderately corrupt who are still pieces of shit are kept in check for at least one generation. and the ones who dindu nuffin as if are left to go about their business. trump sees it as better to negotiate with the new incoming leaders than to threaten all of them at once and back them all into a corner

>>349134

>>349122

>>349297

>The 40% can happen now, but the 60% needs to at least be delay-released, so future generations will have full knowledge of what happened, and the information they need to prevent it from ever happening again.

i think that's exactly what anon was hinting at last night >>343156