dChan
Anonymous ID: 466235 Feb. 12, 2018, 2:02 a.m. No.348769   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8780 >>8827 >>8867 >>9197

>>348727

Plea from a normie, lawfag:

 

Can Michael Flynn withdraw his guilty plea because of undisclosed Giglio material, in particular, that Strzok is a witness (participated in the Flynn interview), and is of poor moral character (affair while married with a married woman), who admitted to "fine edits of 302s" (interviews that are not recorded), and who was relegated to HR duty because of demonstrated bias?

 

It is my opinion that the Mueller investigation move to delay sentencing is in fact a political maneuver to delay disclosure that they neglected to disclose Giglio information to the Flynn defense team.

 

Please, pretty please, can any lawfags comment?

Anonymous ID: 466235 Feb. 12, 2018, 2:30 a.m. No.348881   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8903 >>8948

>>348867

A question: isn't Giglio much easier to win vs. fruit of the poisoned tree simply because Giglio doesn't require intent (i.e., negligent failure to disclose Giglio material, even if unknown at the time)?

 

Obviously this is a political case, and Flynn is a political target, which leads me to think, why wouldn't he agree? Of course he would, blowing up later is better than blowing up sooner.

 

Especially for damages reasons (which you mention). The longer damages accrue, the better, right?

Anonymous ID: 466235 Feb. 12, 2018, 2:35 a.m. No.348903   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>348881

Let me rephrase: Giglio is "strict" in a kinda legal way whereas fruit of a poisoned tree is "abstract" in a kinda legal way.

 

So, my presumption would be that Giglio would be a preferred approach for Flynn council. Right?

 

What the fuck is going on here? Why aren't we seeing Hannity talk about Giglio just like "acid wash"? You have a clear witness/prosecution bias, the bias was not disclosed, the whole thing blew up into the public eye, and SURPRISE!!!! sentencing "mutually" postponed.

 

What the fuck