Anonymous ID: 75b003 Feb. 12, 2018, 3:20 a.m. No.349106   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9112 >>9122 >>9214

ID 5497ff

This guy once posted 174 times in a single thread. He has slightly changed his MO, but expect multiple memes, calling everyone a shill, and accusing them of being "triggered." Total azzhat. Make sure you report him before you filter him. He'll shit up the thread faster than anyone. He's a little late today. His mother must be getting tired of waking him in the morning.

Anonymous ID: 75b003 Feb. 12, 2018, 3:30 a.m. No.349146   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9163 >>9218

>>349140

Q said to check the passenger manifest. His "over target" may only mean "Yes, that's the passenger manifest." Yes, it may also mean that is the guy, but in the past, Q has been pretty clear when the target is hit. I believe "over target" means only that the list is the one to dig.

Anonymous ID: 75b003 Feb. 12, 2018, 3:34 a.m. No.349158   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>349149

My guess is a group from dailycows are coming over here now, because their basements are getting cold. I try to ignore all but the most annoying, who is apparently back with a different IP. BV did his best, but his kind are one of the speed bumps we have to put up with to maintain anonymity.

 

>>349155

We have a winner! What do we have for him, Johnny?

Anonymous ID: 75b003 Feb. 12, 2018, 3:46 a.m. No.349212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9221

>>349156

>>349155

ID: 916bae

It's like fukkin' Poltergeist… He's baaa-aack. Same memes. Same crap. He'll be calling

folks "triggered" shortly. I won't post about him anymore. Just be aware that he usually shits

up several threads before he leaves. Report and filter is the best policy.

Anonymous ID: 75b003 Feb. 12, 2018, 4:03 a.m. No.349266   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>349256

The other anon said birthdate one is 1986, and the other graduated in 1987 (or vice versa). In any case, I've seen stranger mistakes on manifests. Just that one discrepancy is not enough (yet) for me to say it is not (or IS) the guy.

Anonymous ID: 75b003 Feb. 12, 2018, 4:08 a.m. No.349287   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>349278

"Bullseye" would have worked as well, without ambiguity. I am not 100% convinced the name is the guy, but I'd say I lean that way more than the other, after a few recent sauces. Originally, I was the one who suggested it was only the right list. Still not convinced either way, but leaning to "yeah… that's the guy."