>>3522735 (lb)
>Ah now if I were to answer that straight it would open too big a can of worms.
Honestly, it's related to Q research to quite an extent.
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/612849.html#613229
>>613193
>We are saving Israel for last.
>Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.
>Q
I think it'd be safe to dabble a bit without coming across as a slide.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shlomo_Sand
Geneticist Dr. Eran Elhaik has published two research papers which cite Sand's work extensively. The first, "The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses", came out in December 2012 argued that genetic evidence points to a "mosaic of Near Eastern-Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries" within the founding population of modern European Jews.[18] The theory proved highly controversial, and was contested by a number of historians and several geneticists.[19] Elhaik's second paper, in collaboration with others, similarly used Sand's work and concluded that the Ashkenazi descend from 'a heterogeneous Iranian population, which later mixed with Eastern and Western Slavs and possibly some Turks and Greeks in the territory of the Khazar Empire around the 8th century A.D.'[20]
Sand was criticized for presenting "dubious theories" regarding Jewish identity as historical facts.[27] One provocative theory espoused by Sand, but challenged by other historians as "a myth with no factual basis," is the claim that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Khazars, who purportedly converted in the early Middle Ages.[28]
Long/Short;
It's complicated. Someone point me out a Semite-looking, actual, factual, Jew. I have some oceanfront property in Arizona as a trade.