Do NOT engage shills.
Newfags
are you aware of what you and your family are listening to and watching?
Information Poisoning comes in many disguises and rots from the inside or from the root.
https://mysteryoftheiniquity.com/2013/03/12/illuminated-music-more/
Shillcon downgrade
Shills demoralized, division tactics ineffective
FALSE SHILL ALARM
Corrected
DIG MEME PRAY
Boom, boom, boom.
Do NOT engage shills.
The Ruin of Kasch
25 Min (audio only)
Comfy here with a shill filtered.
In Volume II, Book 4, Chapter 6 of Democracy in America, de Tocqueville writes the following about soft despotism:
Thus, After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.
I have always thought that servitude of the regular, quiet, and gentle kind which I have just described might be combined more easily than is commonly believed with some of the outward forms of freedom, and that it might even establish itself under the wing of the sovereignty of the people.
Our contemporaries are constantly excited by two conflicting passions: they want to be led, and they wish to remain free. As they cannot destroy either the one or the other of these contrary propensities, they strive to satisfy them both at once. They devise a sole, tutelary, and all-powerful form of government, but elected by the people. They combine the principle of centralization and that of popular sovereignty; this gives them a respite: they console themselves for being in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians. Every man allows himself to be put in leading-strings, because he sees that it is not a person or a class of persons, but the people at large who hold the end of his chain.
By this system the people shake off their state of dependence just long enough to select their master and then relapse into it again. A great many persons at the present day are quite contented with this sort of compromise between administrative despotism and the sovereignty of the people; and they think they have done enough for the protection of individual freedom when they have surrendered it to the power of the nation at large. This does not satisfy me: the nature of him I am to obey signifies less to me than the fact of extorted obedience. I do not deny, however, that a constitution of this kind appears to me to be infinitely preferable to one which, after having concentrated all the powers of government, should vest them in the hands of an irresponsible person or body of persons. Of all the forms that democratic despotism could assume, the latter would assuredly be the worst.
When the sovereign is elective, or narrowly watched by a legislature which is really elective and independent, the oppression that he exercises over individuals is sometimes greater, but it is always less degrading; because every man, when he is oppressed and disarmed, may still imagine that, while he yields obedience, it is to himself he yields it, and that it is to one of his own inclinations that all the rest give way. In like manner, I can understand that when the sovereign represents the nation and is dependent upon the people, the rights and the power of which every citizen is deprived serve not only the head of the state, but the state itself; and that private persons derive some return from the sacrifice of their independence which they have made to the public.
People who are not criminals, who do not lie for a living, who feel terrible when they do lie, have difficulty in imagining that there are people, very different from themselves, who lie constantly. Imagine how those lies might accumulate over the years since November 22, 1963. Remember, it was following that November that CIA coined the phrase "conspiracy theory" to describe alternative explanations for JFK's assassination. Alternative to the Warren Commission report, which it's fair to say, did not offer a plausible account of what happened and never, ever touched on the "why." In retrospect that seems strange, not talking about why, about motives.
Imagine a monstrous crime like the killing of a president, if it were not done by a lone gunman named Oswald. If it were done, for example by people whose business it is to assassinate world leaders and to make it appear to be done by misfit lone gunmen. Such a crime would involve a number of people, highly skilled, highly placed, intelligent, but morally - let's say "ify." How could conspirators be confident that one of their ify-er conspirators didn't rat out the team?
How about creating dozens of "conspiracy" theories, even naming yourself in some of them? Hah. Nothing but a bunch of conspiracy theories. How can we ever hope to know the truth?
Now as long as we're imaging a group of skilled, experienced conspirators murdered our president, let's imagine why and let's wonder too if the type of people who murder a president become law abiding citizens subsequently.
Let's say the conspirators have no ideology. They're not left wing, they're not right wing, politics are a sorry show put on for the rubes. When you murder presidents, you do that because they are a threat to you and you do it for money and power. People who seek money and power never get enough and they never stop seeking more money and more power. It seems we can safely imagine our modern high-tech conspirators didn't stop stealing and didn't stop killing either. They did not stop in Imperial Rome.
Since 1963 this imaginary crew of killers would have grown immeasurably richer and enormously more powerful. It's hard to imagine indeed, how having killed a president, they would not then control the government. Naturally they would have to take steps to see no Whitehats got into your wood pile.
JFK was a good man and that meant he had a lot of enemies. He talked about secret societies in a famous speech and he had promised that he would take our national secret society, the CIA, and smash it into a thousand tiny pieces. And scatter it to the winds.
pink pill for light sleepers
pink pill for light sleepers pt 2
Who isn’t fascinated by the CIA, and by its predecessor agencies across the pond, MI5 and 6, and GHCQ who had their NSA access terminated last night. British secret services fostered CIA and these secret societies go very far back; well beyond famous Thomas Walshingham who ran Elizabeth R’s secret service in Shakespeare's day. Thom Walshingham ran playwright Kit Marlow as an asset and murdered him when he became…unsound, unreliable and was ever wanting money. The Brit secret services are older than their navy, the so-called "senior service" and might claim, with some justice, to date back as far as the Crusades, or to Babylon.
People who have worked for the CIA over the years, it's hard to know where to begin – Dr Sidney Gottlieb was the "mad scientist" type, but he wasn't mad, he was possessed. Gottlieb thought he was in charge of an entity which instead that took full charge of him. Have you seen “the Exorcist?” That girl’s case was a low-level possession, the high-level ones are more like Hannibal Lector, or Sidney Gottlieb.
Gottlieb adapted the mind control techniques developed by Dr. Josef Mengele, who wasn't just torturing prisoners for being Jews at Auschwitz, he was torturing prisoners as part of a trauma-based mind control research program. Dr Gottlieb improved Mengele’s system enormously, but the basic framework created in Gottlieb’s MK Ultra and successor programs is still known as "the Mengele matrix."
Colorful sociopaths, many quite brilliant, have populated the CIA since its inception. Not least among these was George H.W. Bush. Talk about coincidences, the old Bonesman happened to be in the Dallas vicinity Nov 22 1962. (If anyone gives him a heroes’ funeral, I'll weep blood.)
George H.W. Bush is underrated in terms of ruthless malignity and duplicity. "Black humor is like food, not everybody gets it," is in the G H W Bush style.
Caesars were routinely murdered in Imperial Rome. There were a lot of them to murder, with two Empires running and two Caesars for each capital, and start counting usurpers it can really add up. We shouldn't be shocked by the murder of our leaders.
Yet we still are. Some of us are, anyway. To us JFK’s murder has always felt profoundly wrong, and evil and the failure to bring his killers to justice a public stain a dishonor to and a shame on us all.
Perhaps if we investigated that long ago killing it would ease our conscience about the injustice done to JFK and his family. Seeing justice done in JFK’s case might clear up a few other cases, crimes committed by members of the conspirator group, their successors, inheritors and children, and by doing this improve our own children’s future.
Fuck all the Perfect People.