Anonymous ID: 238f5b Nov. 3, 2018, 12:27 a.m. No.3711212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1244 >>1700

>>3711150

>>3711110

>>3711168

The 1952 paper, the first to propose "the adrenochrome theory of psychosis" was 1st presented, not to a group of scientists, but to a VERY INTERESTED NY Committee for Dimentia Praecox of the Royal Scottish Rites.

 

If you look all the way back, all of these doctors and scientists were sick pedos I think, and all of the scientific definitions that made it to the general public scream coverup; it helped deflect and real attention while they carried on their parties/sacrifices/sick science.

Even Autism/epilepsy ties in when you look at the 54 paper and realize they were using "epileptics" to test the adrenochrome on because they had a general understanding of seizures back then and could give the adrenochrome and watch the eegs spike similar to seizures, then turn around and give the nicitinic acid (niacin) and watch them calm down. Go figure: They lied.

Anonymous ID: 238f5b Nov. 3, 2018, 12:32 a.m. No.3711244   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3711106

>>3711212

>>3711168

>>3711150

Definitely wasn't what I was trying to do. My wife has it so I get to take care of her and homeschool our 2 kids. Just saying this whole thing is one big happy "let's not let anyone know about our secret science/sacrifice/jollies. Let's twist these things up so bad they'll never know or get better" sort of thing, dating back to Bleuler or maybe farther than that.

Anonymous ID: 238f5b Nov. 3, 2018, 12:38 a.m. No.3711280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1294 >>1403

>>3711237

look up recent work on Anti-Oxidant Defense System (AODS) insult theory of schizo. Gaining a lot of traction and the 1954 HOffer paper I posted on Adrenochrome was actually the landmark study for it. They went to HUGE lengths to tarnish that theory, but they normally pick the most damaging to their cause points and the most easy to sensationalize and try to attack the shit out of them. If you find the studies that referenced the first study, you can look though them; see where they mention the reference, and note the context. make note of it. I call these 1st order references. when you've done that for all of them, go to the 2nd order and do the same thing. If the efforts to discredit are illegitimate, they won't have been able to discredit all of those, and you should be able to trace some part of the paper to the present. I think that will work with all research.

Anonymous ID: 238f5b Nov. 3, 2018, 12:47 a.m. No.3711322   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1442

>>3711237

>>3711258

Glutathione will do it as well. That's why MTHFR gene variants are important and why you NEVER GIVE A KID TYLENOL.

Why some and not others ties to why it takes 500 times to get a quarter in a small mouth jug across the room.

Not just thimerosal (ethyl mercury which is still in multi-dose vials of flu);

Also aluminum (in almost any shot that needs an adjuvant (not live) (Exley great source of info)

Also animal proteins in manufacturing (human dna fragments from aborted fetal tissue) and that is just as bad for auto-immune issues (like aluminum) and autism, as the DNA fragments can work their way into ours (Deisher is great source for this)

 

Good news is it's not always irreversible-yet another lie.

Anonymous ID: 238f5b Nov. 3, 2018, 12:50 a.m. No.3711337   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3711295

it's possibly true,

Chimerism:

the fetal cell lines of vaccines have both a aborted female fetus and aborted male fetus.

That gives us DNA fragments of the opposite sex left over after manufacturing that happen to be the same size of the fragments used for gene therapy, so we have research on this stuff. We know it can cause cancer, and it's possible that when opposite sex DNA mixes with our genes (insertional mutagenesis) that it can lead to gender identity confusion