dChan
Anonymous ID: da1b42 Nov. 5, 2018, 1:16 p.m. No.3744187   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>3744129

I understand that, but this way of phrasing will tend to confirm them in their position by making the justification for it seem self-evident. I just don't think it will be likely to influence those that aren't worried about rights to reconsider.

Anonymous ID: da1b42 Nov. 5, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.3744409   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4437 >>4557

CONSIDER, ANONS

 

What is real, and what is disinformation?

How blended might they be?

 

Q posts the Senator Byrd pic. That appears to certainly be a shop. Q knows this.

So why post that?

Who controls the narrative?

How did the shopped pic spread? What value did it have for OBSCURING THE TRUTH BY EXAGGERATING IT.

 

Think of another Q post, and another related figure: William Cooper. I read part of "Behold a Pale Horse"… my feeling is that Cooper was partially a sheister. Some of what he claimed felt fake, or BSy… But surely some things he says are true…

As far as I remember, Q's reference to Cooper was, as it were, glancing. Just one little nod in that direction… I think it was intentional, in the way the Byrd pic was intentional.

HOW is the narrative controlled on chans?

HOW is the narrative controlled [HERE]?

Chans emerged as a big THREAT.

If they got shut down, that would have stunk to high heaven, and prompted work arounds, and galvanized anons, etc…

But what if chans could be quietly, inperceptibly eroded out from underneath us?

MEMES ARE IMPORTANT.

Anonymous ID: da1b42 Nov. 5, 2018, 1:42 p.m. No.3744557   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>3744437

>>3744409

Think about what Alex Jones is.

 

Check out this PDF of a book by an author that is cited extensively on the "Conspriacy Theory" wikipedia page:

 

http://www.lapidjudaism.com/uploads/8/1/0/5/8105580/barkun_michael_-_a_culture_of_conspiracy.pdf

 

Just the first few pages and you can recognize the style of narrative. Look at the over-the-top, made-for-tv "conspiracy theorist". Breaking into Bohemian Grove…. Coincidentally how Alex Jones got his start…

 

But it isn't enough just to be creating the fake conspiracy theorists, and the fake "alt media"… there also has to be the FAKE INTERNET to consume all these fake products…

 

The chans were a threat.

 

How much can you control by simply flooding the chans (and absolutely everwhere else that organic dissent and resistance could break out) with unlimited AI, memes carefully designed to SEEM PLAUSIBLE ENOUGH, but to undermine in subtle ways…?

We are [here] for a reason…

Anonymous ID: da1b42 Nov. 5, 2018, 1:57 p.m. No.3744712   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4743

>>3744432

MEMES ARE IMPORTANT

How would you control the chans if you didn't want to shut them down?

Inject your own content, as much as is needed to flood out organic content. Make the fake content believable, but keep it always at a low-end of the scale of value. Make it subtely discrediting, undermining, negative, and liable to be contrued negatively to outsiders.

Humans, having no clue, just assume that the overall vibe of any given chan is an organic phenomenon… Many just drift away… And the fakeness is is in control…

Anonymous ID: da1b42 Nov. 5, 2018, 2 p.m. No.3744738   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4786

>>3744695

This anon has memes that tend to make us look like racist, violent extremists. Of course, this anon is a patriot that is doing its best to support Q. But nonetheless, this anon posts memes that you might imagine would do a good job of 1. holding us to a low-level of negativity and divisiveness, and 2. masquerading as "genuine chan" content.

WWG1WGA