>>3760779 (lb)

>you expected the truth to be revealed waayyy before these mid-terms

True, many around here did, including me to some extent. Also true that some anons are a bit short in memory when it comes to acknowledging what they might have claimed just a week before.

Still doesn't mean it won't happen ("both brothers do have a pending sealed indictment"), and after a year most of us should have learned that things can't go as fast as some around here hoped they would. We've even got a "p_pers" explaining that.

>>3761281

Yeah, worst thing is they only exploited/amplified what people "wanted" anyways (convenience, "respect", a fancy "appearance", "fame" etc).

As an eternal "learner", I hardly have to look any further than mobile phones, apps & Microsoft operating systems …