>>3761641

TYB

>>3761766

re: >>3761635 lb

Kek. Is true. All we wanted was to be left alone. Braved the Atlantic and covered wagons and Injuns just for a bit of peace. (((They))) had other plans of course.

That's okay. We "saxons" might be slow to wake, but when we do… WEW!

>>3761569 lb

Thanks for the save, bro. All good over here. So high on the promise of salty-sweet lib tears my feet hardly touch the ground.

>>3761740

Thanks for looking out anon. I'm the baker who noted. We usually include all planefag reports, similar to archive updates etc. Main reason is planefagging is one of the running primary-source research we do here, and the more planefags and other anons see what goes on up there–routine or not–the better, as it builds knowledgeable eyes-on. Most of the flights we track end up being routine and not a notable habbening in and of themselves. Your post giving us additional context on B-52's is helpful, but it's not reason to remove the previous notable, unless it contained misinfo. Maybe the phrase "in action" can be misconstrued to mean actual combat, but it doesn't have that connotation in civilian speak.

Baker

I accidentally deleted the Monday header in Q posts in the dough. Sorry bout that.

Here is pastebin with it edited back in:

https://pastebin.com/MPHdH1UM