>>3919235

Law enforcement legal advisor law fag here. Thanks for that info. I been saying that the info in these were not indictments, as some of the anons in here who don't know about this stuff kept saying. Trying to get them to understand that, hey, this is important but it's not the declass they're looking for.

It's still important, though, and I agree - first step towards declass b/c it makes all these electronic searches visible to the public. I don't do Fed much since I'm a LE adviser for a (major metro) municipal agency. Have applied for the 2703 orders before, but never really worried about mandatory disclosure b/c we've always finished up in 90 days or less with the work I've done.

That many taps, traces, cell searches and email/text captures is off the charts.

>>3919676

I'm one of the lawfags you're bitching about, cornhole. Who the fuck is telling you not to look? Go look all ya damn want to. We're trying to help anons figure out that the fucking things 1) aren't indictments and 2) don't name anybody's names yet.

They're still worth checking out. They are court orders for electronic surveillance and they DO show for what reason the government got 'em, most of which is Cabal-related stuff like CP, terrorism, bribing public officials, gun-running and all other kinds a shit.

So go look, but it's only gonna tell you that. If you conclude anything beyond that, you're making an inference based on no facts.

Engineers call that kind a shit a WAG.

>>3919886

Yeah, right? Go blind reading cases, statutes, regulations and shit for 20 fucking years, then try to help somebody else, and they go all Invasion of the Body Snatchers…"SHILL! SHILL!"

If I was a prick, I'd say next time let's just sit back and let them embarrass themselves.

>>3919920

And you know this how?

The DC circuit partially unsealed a fuckton of electronic surveillance orders.

But that ain't everything under seal in that circuit. There's still plenty of sealed shit, and there is a high probability that many of those are indictments. Especially anything that's over 180 days old and still sealed.

You're leaping to conclusions in the other direction, and that's just as fucking bad. Stop it.

>>3919989

Bull. Mother. Fucking. Shit.

You can't provide dick for sauce 'cause there ain't any, like there apparently isn't hanging from you (blouse).

Run the count. How many case files in the criminal system (PACER shows it) that are old enough to be disclosed under the 2703 disclosure Order…but weren't disclosed.

WTF are they? Clerk's mistakes? Some are other search warrants that won't be disclosed, others are indictments. That's what they would fucking BE.

But you know…

Come jack me off.

>>3920090

>>3920097

Found your lawfag ShillBot, anons.