>>4131288 PB Hey Q, I second this. Working people can't vote in many states because the jury duty risk when you get on the voter rolls can starve your family. You can lose your job. So people who have to work avoid voting. How fair is this?

NOT.

So can we have a law requiring employers to hold the job open if an employee does jury duty, and require a replacement of income so that working people can vote? Also, to lower that cost, can we require the courts to pull from the current list of "unemployed" first, instead of pulling from the list of registered voters? If people are covered by unemployment from switching jobs, or temporary lay off, they are employed already, but have time off. We need some coordination here, so it is safe for working people to vote.

The better half was the only doc in a clinic. If he got pulled for jury duty, the whole place would have to shut down. Over ten years he could not risk getting jury duty.

Hey Q, how about asking POTUS for a EO on jury duty pay, its not fair the way it is set up, at least minimum wage across each state, and federal minimum wage for federal trials,

good and honest hard working or disabled people cant afford to be jury duty, my state is only $6 a day, and just not fair that state workers get a full days pay and common poor folk gets less then starving pay

thanks for your consideration