>>4244439

>>4245186

<3

Third star to the right, straight on til morning.

>>4245200

Where the fuck is the sauce on this?

>>4245308

What text is this from?

>>4245338

Well, it wouldn't be mine, since I didn't cite it, but….

>>4245388

Now, you're just being silly… clearly, if it is a Gospel text at all, then it's gnostic apocrypha

>>4245335

There we go. Would've been my guess, but I don't remember reading that one…

>>4245428

>>4245428

^^^^^^^^^^^

This

>>4245460

Kek, f'sho

>>4245466

*sigh

Yes, yes, we all know how "woke" gnostic Anons are.

Yes, I've read plenty of them, including Thomas. Just not as much as canon.

Thomas is not DATED before those other Gospels, in terms of source material.

The only people who say that are spoopy Harvard psyop professors who want to get their, "See, Gnostics are better" button.

Gnosticism is a trap, to be sure.

ALSO

NICEA doesn't approve any four Gospels as "canon". You'll have to go to Trent for that one.

>>4245466

>>4245536

I try not to consider myself at all, anon.

>>4245549

>>4245585

Hear, hear.

>>4245577

Digits confirm

>>4245791

TOP KEK

NOTABLE