dChan
Anonymous ID: 2d4737 Dec. 12, 2018, 10:40 p.m. No.4288454   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8507 >>8566 >>8968

>>4288308

>>4288308

>MKUltra worked for me!

You know that scene in the "Batman" movie where Luscious Fox says something prophetic like "No man should have this much power?" Yeah, you might as well abandon that way of thinking. Arms races are more like "Iron Man" before he became Iron Man. "As long as it's in the right hands" and all that jazz.

 

Someone asked the most important question that had the most obvious response tonight of Q:

 

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0836cc No.4280247 📁

Dec 12 2018 18:43:49 (EST)

 

Anonymous ID: 074619 No.4280228 📁

Dec 12 2018 18:43:32 (EST)

>>4280189

 

Is there a plan in place for AFTER trump?

 

>>4280228

Yes.

Q

 

Obvious answer to obvious question. Who's controlling those that control the information that control the would-be controllers, at that point? I don't know. Neither do you, or this anon, or that one. The new Pandora's Box that Q has opened is this:

If people from a few hundred years ago gave in to their controllers assuring them that the "public's" best interest were assured in servitude of the "Crown", how can the Q mission continually assure the "woke" masses that trusting the plan is the GPS for following the map into the future? If Q is malevolent, then delivering on the "lock her up promise" would solidify that willing subservience to the "new order" for generations to come. If Q is benevolent, then reassuring anons to trust themselves, continually, instead of putting "faith" into the executioners of evil would be the just and proper way of keeping the path of liberty as an integral part of "the plan".

Anonymous ID: 2d4737 Dec. 12, 2018, 10:56 p.m. No.4288566   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8575 >>8637

>>4288354

Nice ramble, and would read more than 10x to get all the meanings. Langan worthy. People hate statistics, but they are necessary in understanding any potential to a plan that wants to ensure success. I, personally want the "full" disclosure, but I realize I'm of a rare mindset that could handle it, so to speak. I also realize that wifeanon would be in the hospital in that regard, and at least 1 of 2 kidanons (in their adult life; if exposed).

 

So, in relation to this post, I sort of touched on it here:

>>4288454

 

There has to be a Vanguard of information, and how that is maintained to ensure integrity (given the circumstances of human progress) is beyond my pay grade (sorry, couldn't resist), but it's a valid concern.

 

I'm not familiar with the NSA inner workings, but it's a dangerous possibility if it succeeds over the CIA and has a potential to corruptibility. ASIDE FROM THAT, we got Adm. Rogers from it, and that's a real testament to whatever it is they are doing over there. Can Q assure us that the NSA has figured out something that high IQ anons haven't, perhaps, realize yet?

 

The only way this works (optics) is if the W&W can assure the people that control, ultimately, lies within the hands of the people. Trust isn't given; it's earned. In an age of cynics, Repeatable results are integral to a system of trust.