Anonymous ID: 91e0b5 Dec. 12, 2018, 10:55 p.m. No.4288563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8586 >>8598 >>8602 >>8686 >>8782 >>8838 >>8889 >>8973

>>4288520

>>4288537

 

https://www.alaskapublic.org/2018/05/15/coast-guard-seeks-feedback-on-potential-impact-of-6-new-icebreakers/

 

The U.S. Coast Guard is soliciting feedback on their six new polar icebreakers, which are expected to train in Arctic waters as soon as 2023.

 

Commander Kenneth Boda works in the USCG office of cutter forces and is the sponsors’ rep for the heavy polar icebreaker acquisition program. He says the plan is to make at least three of the vessels heavy icebreakers, equipped to travel through the Arctic and Antarctic. That means they have to be Polar Code compliant.

 

“They are going to be the latest technology, current ice-breaking technology, which is really neat, because they are replacing the Polar class vessels, which were built in the mid ‘70s,” Boda said. “We have three key performance parameters for these vessels. We need them to break six feet of ice at three knots, and we want them to break 21 feet of ridged ice. The second is an endurance requirement. We need it to operate between 80 and 90 days without refueling. And the third is interoperability.”

 

Currently, most of the Coast Guard’s icebreaker fleet has exceeded its shelf life. The USCG Cutter Healy, a medium icebreaker, is the only one who hasn’t yet reached 20 years of service.

 

“She was built for a 30-year service life, commissioned and delivered to us in the year 2000,” Boda said. “So, we are looking ahead at doing a mid-life on Healy in the upcoming years to try to extend her life out further.”

 

The Healy is the main Coast Guard vessel that has spent time in Nome’s port and would likely be the icebreaker to respond to emergencies in the Arctic presently, like oil spills. Commander Boda has previous experience with the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and says having a larger Coast Guard presence during those incidents is key.

 

“If you’re looking at a campaign-type response, a response that lasts more than a week, having a mobile platform like this is the way to go,” Boda said. “So, you could see if you had an oil spill that lasted, God forbid, over a month, you would need to be able to get ships up there, you would need to be able to do command and control, have a vessel that can talk to the other ships that are out there, that can direct cleanup operations; those things are important.”

 

The other benefits the Coast Guard lists from having six new polar icebreakers includes year-round search and rescue capabilities in Alaska, increased data gathering and collaboration with researchers in the Arctic, as well as enforcing marine laws related to fishing.

 

When it comes to how these polar icebreakers will affect fish and marine life, that is not yet entirely clear, but the Coast Guard says there won’t be significant impacts to biological resources.

 

“One of the big things that we did for propulsion is we are requiring industry to provide us with two, at least two, podded propulsors,” Boda said. “These podded propulsors actually make the ship extremely maneuverable, and obviously, as these ships get built, we want to get as much feedback as we can from the villages up here, from the communities, and make sure that we are getting you guys something that you need and something that adds value to Alaska.”

 

Commander Boda and USCG hosted public scoping meetings in Kotzebue and Nome last week. They plan to visit Utqiagvik and Anchorage this month, as well. Public comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for these polar icebreakers are being accepted through June 29th.

Anonymous ID: 91e0b5 Dec. 12, 2018, 11 p.m. No.4288602   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4288563

 

excerpt: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/06092018/icebreaker-coast-guard-ship-gao-review-polar-security-science-construction-risks-costs-congress

 

U.S. Has 2 Icebreakers Today, with Critical Roles

The Coast Guard currently has two icebreakers to fulfill its mission at the poles—the Polar Star, a heavy icebreaker built in 1976 with an expected 30-year lifespan, and the Healy, a medium icebreaker that entered service in 2000. A third icebreaker, the Polar Sea, has been out of commission since 2010, but has been used for parts to keep the Polar Star running.

 

"If we hold these new icebreakers up for a year or two for additional studies, it's likely to increase the gap where there might not be a U.S. Coast Guard polar icebreaker available," said Lawson Brigham, a former captain of the Polar Sea and Arctic researcher at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

 

The icebreakers are critical to supporting U.S. interests at the poles. In Antarctica, the Polar Star helps ensure scientific stations can be accessed year-round and have the needed supplies. In the Arctic, both ships are used to support science and are available to support oil spill cleanup efforts, search-and-rescue operations in Alaska and enforcing marine laws related to fishing.

Anonymous ID: 91e0b5 Dec. 12, 2018, 11:18 p.m. No.4288782   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4288563

 

Dec 4 2018 DoD article on a greater Arctic Presence

 

https://www.defense.gov/explore/story/Article/1705544/coast-guard-commandant-wants-bigger-arctic-presence-how-cool-is-that/

Anonymous ID: 91e0b5 Dec. 12, 2018, 11:24 p.m. No.4288838   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8889 >>8973

>>4288563

 

https://news.usni.org/2018/12/07/39423

 

DHS appropriations concerns to provide CG icebreakers

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Karl Schultz is guardedly optimistic his service will get funding for a new Polar Security Cutter in time to start construction in 2019.

 

The Coast Guard – though considered one of the nation’s five armed services – falls under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Congress has not yet approved the Fiscal Year 2019 DHS spending plan.

 

“The real seminal question here is what happens in this Fiscal Year 2019 budget,” Schultz said during a Thursday speech. “The President’s budget request asks for $750 million for the Polar Security Cutter. There are House and Senate versions of the bill.”

 

As Schultz spoke Thursday at the National Press Club and unveiled the Coast Guard’s 2018-2022 strategic plan, Congress passed a short-term continuing resolution that covers the parts of the government not already funded in an earlier appropriations bill. The Department of Defense is included in this previously approved legislation. If signed by President Donald Trump, the continuing resolution would continue to fund DHS at FY 2018 levels until a longer-term deal is approved.

 

Part of the problem, Schultz explained, is the House and Senate bills are different – one fully funds the Polar Security Cutter, one provides no money for the program. Any long-term delay in approving FY 2019 spending could drive up the icebreaker’s cost and endanger the Coast Guard’s ability to patrol the polar regions.

 

“I think our program, our acquisition program for getting the Polar Security Cutter is better served by getting a budget sooner than later,” Schultz told USNI News after his speech. “I’m not a tea leaf reader. I don’t know what the calculus on the White House and the Hill is about you know, do we get a budget done under the current Republican Congress or do you roll that forward. That’s above my pay grade.”