Anonymous ID: 30573e Dec. 30, 2018, 12:57 a.m. No.4518886   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5625

>>4464019

>Today, we see racist appellations applied to certain alleged ET groups

 

You're not fooling anyone by IP hopping, Griershill.

William Tompkins had sauce, unlike you, and his accounts, among whats carved in stone, lead me to believe in Reptilians.

Each time you refute this by calling Anons racists, you paint yourself with the same brush as the left wing media.

 

>How much information – bandied about so cavalierly as fact

 

How much has been carved in stone for thousands of years that you flagrantly disregard?

 

>CSETI (The Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence – www.CSETI.org)

 

How many times are you going to shamelessly self promote?

With respect to the planned FF and alien invasion 'theory', you keep referring to Von Braun.

A Nazi who was coerced into working with the allies after the war.

The Nazi's were 'supposedly' working with the Draco's.

 

>>4468730

>CSETI.org

 

A dynamic IP advertising CSETI? Really?

 

>>4510192

>to be shot down and raided by our excellent security forces here.

 

Your ignorance is self evident.

A Facebook satellite was destroyed along with a SpaceX Falcon 9 on the launch pad several years ago.

Presumably this was a malevolent satellite, and likely some peaceful ET's destroyed.

There are several videos scientifically breaking down the event, such as the speed, trajectory, second pas

s to ensure job was done, comparison to birds / insects, the concentrated flash of the beam, the fact the rocket exploded from the structural payload section with zero chance of this happening on it's own.

Oh yeah, Elon Musk also claimed he believed a UFO did this.

Engineers claimed "something alien to our systems" did it.

This was fear being put into the masses to increase the military industrial complex, when all along it was an asset of an evil company destroyed, by an evil company trying to launch it.

If benevolent / malevolent ET's wanted a conventional war with us, we wouldn't stand a chance.

 

>>4510592

>Imagine you are the CIA chief of covert consciousness ops (whom the shills on this forum telling us to shine lasers at ETV very well may be working for…

 

ALL of Grier's teams interesting encounters had at least one LASER in the group.

The moment when you realize Griershill is labelling Anons as CIA disinfo agents, because they are using lasers MAKING CONTACT with  PRIMARY SOURCE videos of their OWN.

Lasers = You need no gatekeepers.

 

>the very scientists who push it are saying the brain is composed of sub-atomic particles

 

There you have it… Griershill claiming to have more answers than all of Quantum Physics, Theoretical Physics, Chaos Theory and Neurobiology combined.

Anyone notice how Grier constantly reuses the word "consciousness" in his interviews to the point the word is incredibly annoying?

To the point hearing that word coming out of his mouth makes you want to strangle him?

Is it a coincidence that Griershill is regurgitating all of Grier's talking points verbatim? CE-5 CE-5, Consciouness, human initiated contact (x1000).

My frens… This shit is getting old.

 

>They’re saying consciousness arises out of particles that have no consciousness.

 

Sound familiar?

Griershill is now the official authority on all things physics and biology.

You might as well stop researching everything, Griershill has all the answers.