>>4708741
>The constant opposition against CE5 makes me wonder what the idea against it suggests.
The oppositions arises from the narrative of who is pushing it.
People are encouraged to make contact.
Isn't that obvious?
However, constantly drawing attention to Rockefeller funded individuals and projects (Greer / CE-5) is highly suspect.
It means that people are being pushed into a certain subset of information, and ridiculed for looking into anything that isn't controlled by that gatekeeper paradigm.
It's happened many times on here, and all captured and archived.
The Anon who posted their contact videos (that Greershill stole and uploaded without permission) has claimed to have many contact experiences.
No negative experiences reported from my understanding.
I believe the entire point being made is, don't expect all ET's to either be peaceful or negative.
Just be aware of what you're doing.
Take the experience for what it is.
>If those who are entirely against a peaceful engagement of ET beings
This your own projection, and immediately being called out as untruthful.
>trying to subvert the idea to the mass consciousness that they can contact ET beings with thought alone and therefore become experiencers rather than researchers makes me question the motives of those who try to dispute the idea.
You can do this, no one has denied that.
I've seen enough on my own to realize that is real.
Lasers speed up the process however.
Once again, the disinfo campaign on here is drawing attention to CE-5 (and the individuals who run it, along with their narrative).
It's almost as if Anons disagree with CE-5 or Greer or the Rockefeller initiative, they are labelled as trying to subvert making contact with consciousness.
Labelled as trying to subvert contact methods in general.
People need to make contact on their own terms, and they don't need Greer, you don't need to pay to watch his videos, you don't need to pay for CE-5 app's for that, nor the narrative being pushed in that agenda.
Conscious contact is real, but you don't need to group that with the pure evil behind Greer and his projects to make himself rich.
>I would very much enjoy to converse with a set of beings who have a mathematical understand higher than humans. I want to see those equations.
Then do it!
Stop talking about it on here, go outside and make the effort.
>>4708813
>I have also seen that from what Greer claims is that he doesn't say they are all peaceful.
There has been a ton of sauce to prove otherwise, numerous links to Greer claiming all ET's are peaceful.
Would you care to provide some sauce that states otherwise?
Or are you just talking ad hoc?
Sauce and links would be greatly appreciated, instead of just giving your opinion.
>But when you look at it from a different perspective our nukes have the ability to destroy all of us especially due to fall out. Were those aliens trying to give us a message?
That is obvious… and you are making a rhetorical statement.
Mankind needs to be protected from themselves, aside from the Draco's we're our own worst enemy.