>>4358052

Sorry, not on the internet much. Check out Grant Cameron and his latest info for the genetic stuff. He is the source for the information that they have gene mapped the marker for those who are more likely to have contact experiences. I believe this is from Dr. Gary Nolan and Dr. Kit Green's work. They allegedly have also been able to gene map the white blood cells of people injured by close contact with powered up craft - i.e., experiencers, researchers, and military personnel that have been in close proximity to these craft that are emitting high levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation.

I'm pretty pessimistic about anything that has CIA fingerprints on it. But having had enough anomalous experiences in my life I do believe there is a concerted effort to drip feed the real story to the public. But it is wrapped in so much horseshit. I swear, CIA can't do anything the straightforward and honest way. They just can't help themselves.

Take Greer and DeLong for example. Both are being fed information from the government. Greer says all ET's are good. DeLong says all ET's are bad. Both of them are full of shit.

Something is happening and it is real, but anyone that says they have the Truth is deluded. IMO, the only way to know what is really going on is to trust yourself. The truth is out there, but they won't give it to you.

>>4358016

I think you are thinking clearly. The Great Awakening. Yep.

>>4355006

The people that are doing the genetic mapping are Dr. Gary Nolan. Dr. Nolan runs the Nolan lab and he is specifically looking at the genetics of paranormal experiencers. He is working with Dr. Hal Puthoff and Dr. Christopher "Kit" Green specifically around genetic markers of those who have been injured by UAP encounters. He is also the person who has mapped the genetic marker that identifies those who are more likely to be an experiencer. I don't have the sauce for it but allegedly Dr. Green has also been able to fine map the brain and has identified an area he refers to as 'the antenna' found in people that are contactees and experiencers. I'm embedding a video. Take it with a grain of salt. Like anything else it is up to you to do your own research and decide how much of this is truth.

The Rh neg info is from another video of an interview from earlier this year with Grant Camerson. Sorry, I can't remember which one.

>>4398638

Something along those lines… I think the point is even the researchers don't know even after 70 years of trying to figure it all out. But things are speeding up. That is why I think this is all tied into the "The Great Awakening." I do know that the drip of information is getting quicker, and we are seeing more anomalies world wide this year… all speeding up.

>>4414423

For the same reason Tom DeLong is universally hated. Both these men have huge egos and both are being played by the intelligence community. Theories why abound. They are filling Greer's head with "Yes, you are the only one that gets it!" and they have lead him to believe all EBE/ET's are good and leading us into spirituality. They are filling DeLong's head with "Yes, you are the only one that gets it!" and they have lead him to believe all EBE/ET's are evil and are out to replace/enslave us all.

Likely the IC doesn't have much of a clue what these phenomena are. Until they actually produce some real solid, touchable evidence, as long as they promise everything to people like Greer and DeLong and produce nothing tangible, I'm going with "unexplained phenomena" and with the belief that the IC/CIA, etc., are lying shits.

>>4420092

Where are the alloys? Anyone seen those? Seen any scientific evaluations? Anyone held, felt, touched them? Or the aliens?

Why don't they just land in Time Square and let the reporters photograph them? Why is it the "aliens" only make contact with the very most secret of our closed bases? If this is real (in a physical sense) how could it ever be hidden?

If these were actual physical beings visiting us enmasse from other star systems there is no intelligence agency in the world that could hide it from us. So is it a phenomenology problem as one researcher has suggested? No tangible there there just more mystery?

>>4420347

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html

>>4427372

You assume they have our best interests at heart. Therefore they would do nothing to panic people, etc. My question is why would they care? You may say they may have some sort of prime directive in place, in which case I would say, then why make contact at all which is interference.

So we have a government that supposedly has made contact with real physical beings, and they and these aliens or beings or whatever are both keeping quiet about it. At the same time we have government leaking classified information - but hey, as much as we loathe those who break security protocols to the point where even someone making statements about classified material are and have been jailed for years… but not a single person involved in the UFO disclosure effort has EVER been prosecuted.

So, what is coming from government sources is either propaganda and lies, or it is declassified. If it is declassified why can we not get FOIA requests through for these same disclosures?

Riddle me these things.

Here is one of the reasons (one of many) that I believe the facts point to the whole UFO being more phenomena than physical and that phenomena being intimately tied to people of a certain type. In one of the links below you will find the NY Times article about the 'tic-tac' aircraft episode from 2004 (USS Nimmizt carrier group and USS Princeton). The second link is the released Pentagon Executive report on the incident. It is 13 pages long, but please read it carefully as this lays out exactly what occurred. None of the reports filed regarding this incident were classified because they were on a final training mission before deploying to the Saudi Arabian peninsula - and training missions are never classified.

In the Pentagon Executive Report you will find that with the 5 people that were sent out on F/A-18 aircraft to intercept and investigate, their experiences were not the same.

One saw the water disturbance and the AAV hovering over the water;

One saw the water disturbance only;

one saw the object via FLIR camera but could not see it with his eyes;

One saw the AAV only;

One saw nothing.

A submarine in the area picked up no water disturbance.

The FLIR recording can be viewed at the Times article link.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html

https://media.lasvegasnow.com/nxsglobal/lasvegasnow/document_dev/2018/05/18/TIC%20TAC%20UFO%20EXECUTIVE%20REPORT_1526682843046_42960218_ver1.0.pdf

>>4441398

All I have are rumors, rumors of a genetic marker and a fine brain area in those that can see and experience these things. It may have to do with the way consciousness interacts on a quantum level with reality. Shroedinger's cat stuff.

>>4442307

>What if it's not rumors. What if something really happens to us when we start to see the game that is being played?

That part is not rumor. It is known that our immune system keeps a record of anything that affects it. That is how we acquire immunity from bacteria and viruses, but also there is a genetic record of at least some of the anomalous events - if you are injured. That is just a function of the white cells and how they "learn."

That is not the genetic marker I was talking about. No sauce on this except from the UFO researchers who are basically quoting each other. Allegedly, Dr. Nolan (Nolan Labs) working with Dr. Puthoff and Dr. Green have taken DNA samples from Uri Geller, Ingo Swann, one of the distance viewing guys (sorry can't remember which one) and from a number of people that witnessed AAV's or had 'alien' contact. From these DNA samples they were able to isolate the same DNA marker that was present in each of them and not present in the normal, non-experiencer population. The fine brain area they identified and which they call 'the antenna' is also present in the same population and absent from normal populations.

For further information on these topics, you can find Grant Cameron videos from this past Spring on youtube.

>>4443790

This genetic marker, I am told, is not a change, but is present from birth.

https://coi.tothestarsacademy.com/atacama-skeleton/

Garry Nolan, Ph.D.

Rachford and Carlotta A. Harris Professor

Department of Microbiology and Immunology

Stanford University School of Medicine