My first thought of ETs who extract semen in the night from people is to punch their fucking lights out.
>Closing our eyes and imagining something is real, doesn't make it real unfortunately.
Meh, if you consider that the conscious mind is not the entirety of the individual. And because of that the boundaries imposed between stuff and things are a product of it. Then there's a lot more room to work with symbolic concepts. The underlying reality is always distorted by our perception of it. Thought be it imaginary or reality is used to navigate thru the senses the underlying reality
>"Feelings" can be easily constructed / manipulated by the individual.
Depends on your conditioning. If it was easy to manipulate your feelings, I'd believe depression and anxiety would be far fewer.
>Would you care to fill us in on the imaginary narrative?
Not agreeing with the 'Federation' stuff. Humanity has only relatively recently become self-aware. When something is self-aware the only thing it can do is become more aware. The whole 'reset'; 'cosmic police','cabal', IMHO, serve to build that perception. The plasticity of the general public's emotional complexes is restricted. What if the UFO phenomena is psychological? We have various layers of social activities and dynamics. I don't agree with any top-down approach as a narrative. Because of the Galactic Federation Narrative, the abiding segment of the Ufo community is psychological frozen, I'd say. On the other hand there are those who are more intellectually frozen
>Seeing is believing.
Yes, that is true. What is more true is that if there is no framing of the perception it will be disregarded. In this case, a notion of the reality must be present before the perception occurs though the perception will present an anomaly or inconsistency to the ordering mechanism which creates the influx of continuous perception
>It's hard to do serious Q research when there's barely any evidence out there
Dude, that's not true. Heard of UFO research? What constitutes evidence to you anyway?
>Because of your push I'm going to make a better effort to start posting articles on UFOs. I appreciate the encouragement.
Shucks…..I have an inkling the element of, not unknown, but mystery is driving the dissonance filled acceptance of 'other-life' and more broadly alternative perception (labels like conspiracy, included)
We have a sorting problem to create a cohesive awareness of phenomena which we are semi-aware of. We also double-dip with our biases. It's a bitch filled with smoke and mirrors. Inattentional blindness is a real thing.
This was pretty interesting. Seems to me there's a parity of ability to sense electromagnetic fields and this 'antenna' concept. I'd bet along the lines of compressing a standing wave (of thought) to build things.
>Something along those lines
How One Man Created a 1,000 Ton Coral Castle in 1923
https://gizmodo.com/how-one-man-created-a-1-000-ton-coral-castle-in-1923-1443356836
Between 1923 and 1951, a diminutive Floridian single-handedly and without heavy machinery moved 1,000 tons of limestone, creating out of it a castle. This is his story.
The Builder
Very little is known of the mysterious creator of the Coral Castle, Ed Leeskalnin. Born in Riga, Latvia in 1887 to a family of stonemasons, Ed immigrated to the U.S. sometime around 1913 after his fiancée broke off their engagement (and a large piece of his heart). During a bout with tuberculosis around 1919, he moved to Florida, where magnets were apparently used to treat his condition. This experience seems to have had a life-changing effect, as you’ll see later.
>Needs a bit more sauce
Ed believed that the animating force in the universe does not come from the protons and electrons in the atom, but rather from tiny magnets of different and opposite polarity that imbue all matter. In his book, Magnetic Current, Ed explained his basic principle
It is this “perpetual power” that Ed claims to have harnessed in order to move, carve and place his humongous stones. The power itself came from a machine he dubbed the Perpetual Motion Holder (PMH). He built it on his idea that electricity is made up of two magnetic forces that move opposite each other in a double helix motion. Ed’s machine was composed of two coiled wires, each having its own terminal and current, and connected to each other nose to tail in a circuit. This completed circuit allowed individual magnets to form into one of two currents, and the currents to “chase” each other in a never ending loop.
> I will be looking at the mathematics behind this now that I have found this
>Reich was sentenced to two years imprisonment, and that summer over six tons of his publications were burned by order of the court. He died in prison of heart failure just over a year later, days before he was due to apply for parole.
>Why do they want to suppress it?
http://www.orgonelab.org/wrhistory.htm
Wilhelm Reich's findings and theories on human sexuality, family structure and human emotions are paramout for a clear understanding of the origins of fascist (Left or Right-wing varieties), and totalitarian warlike societies. His experiments on the biophysics of life-energy resolve an equal number of riddles and mysteries in biology, physics, meteorology and astronomy. Here, I will give a bare-bones review of Reich on these issues.
Reich's early work was not focused merely upon "sexual organs and orgasms", as his critics so freqently claim, but examined the whole complex of social issues which affect people's capacity for love and a gratifying sexuality – these were essential prerequisites for happy families and children, and hence cooperatively stable and non-violent social structures. Reich proposed family-structure was the foundation upon which state-structure was formed, and that the two composed a self-reinforcing functional unit. Patriarchal authoritarian families based upon forced and compulsive moralism led to authoritarian state structures. Where family life was more fluid and permissive, a self-regulated morality existed, with a similarly cooperative social and state structure. From that essential standpoint, his later clinical and experimental work led forth into new territory and a host of new discoveries and findings
>If you were the aliens, wouldn't you spread so much disinformation that it all just loops back to itself?
This is a good point. Directly understanding consciousness processes requires a sorting of information. Literally of the bodily nature, mental nature and in social combinations
>And most of the evidence is pointing to that we are living so far from reality that we need to go deeper.
Solid observation. There is a solvable problem of credibility in subjective experience. Reich's function of orgasm and subsequent research into orgone, quite interests me
>I don’t really know the truth for sure but my humble intuition is…
It seems to me we participate using our understanding of what is true to discover the truth.
>I thought at this point most people could believe that these craft are using anti-gravity and even trans-dimensional propulsion methods
I think consciousness structures reality not the other way around. Truncated understandings of reality without necessary openness to evaluate your biases perturbs
>I would say that it's pretty magical to lead an entire planet to your end goal, by rule, and leave your symbols out in the open as communication. Here's the kicker that I have found to be quite "illuminating" - pun intended -, most people are doing it by their free will.
Hmmm, This is pretty interesting. The breadth of symbolized concepts and their association within society as a method of control? Most people have pretty short attention spans. What if with 10 or so generations of planning you could select the 2,000-3,000 word people tends to use to navigate the world. Technology could distract people political theater could make it so people don't bother to care
>Be careful what to believe. Remote viewing, CE5, telepathic communication, all of it could be an exploitation of psychotic continuum.
Pretty interesting. Been studying orgone. When we socialize with each other we define the game. Using the word, 'game', seems unappreciative of the breadth of life. However, consider the value of individual expression in a collective landscape. There are many exchanges we all partake in over the course of a day each with a commensurate role.
Rituals have normalized certain dynamics of stimulus and response
What if logic was appreciating infinity, which can be done endlessly, and the outcome being orgasm seeks to merge to reform the ability to appreciate infinity? Seems to me there is already the biological mechanism in place. The social could then be a product of it.
ESP follows the same line of thought. Social reckoning of possibility buttresses semi-biases as to the conditioning processes of outcomes or ,at a more local level, abilities.
>Are you thinking of the importance of search and recovery (the hunt) in social interactions?
No, that's too narrow
>How do we benefit from our quantum natures in any given reality we find ourselves?
I have a slight problem to what most people mean by quantum. Let's say experience is cyclical and awareness as a catalyst moves outward. Let's pretend then quantum is the inner, hollowed experience. Upon reducing an inner experience by recollection of a definite cycle one eventually finds irreducible static or noise. These functions eventually have significant influence on outward expansion of consciousness much like emotional complexes
>Sounds like the metaphysicians and philosophers and even the priests all seem to say that experiences and choices and personality traits (like preferences) are the way to make use of alternate realities.
Agree overall
>However, there's truth to be found anywhere we look
There is something true to be found anywhere because the nature of truth is reality. Truth is not readily apparent.
>Should we clean the edges and leave the mess in the center of the room in full display?
Don't care
When more people can see auras the gap between 'materialists' and 'spiritualists' will narrow.
It is a firm belief most people are caught within a challenging set of beliefs and don't see the light at the end of the tunnel, of sorts.
I think I've come to grasp a modicum of the inter-generational shift in thinking. Reich would equate it to the liberalization of the 'Sex-Economy'. The younger generation has far more subjective and relativistic logic underpinning behavior and much more free sexually. Regressing back to the mid 1940's when parity among the sexes socially was seeded, the transitive nature of social roles, collectively, started to be explored. The anticipatory reaction to unknown potentials of social experience has become so characteristically transitive the, let's say, identity matrix has data anomalies.
Also it seems, the bombard of talking points, propaganda and compulsory behavior reduces the meaningful exchanges between people. Colloquially, making use of these anomalies is having a narrative.
It seems to me the symbol correspondence overlap to thought experimentation has too many overlays. This seems in-part consequence by deference of spiritual maturity.
Reich invented the orgonoscope "through which flashes of biological energy can be seen, to unpopular characteristic". He recognized "he had the gift of grappling with a profusion of seething thoughts and emerging with practical results".
Interesting, these flashes of biological light become encapsulated in the originating consciousness. In effect, the cognitive processes become furthered redounding to the perception of aliveness.
The orb phenomena may well be forms of orgone energy as a technology. Considering Reich's work was suppressed, burned and he jailed, one may make the case this was done by necessity to maintain an authoritarian-control structure, as stated in his work.
The bounds of what is considered 'real', is based upon what? The perceiving consciousness makes the determination, not of existence, but of the scope of effects, which may be imaginary or unconscious , if rejected, or real and 'perceptible', if accepted. The biological constraints and determinism, either way, localize the perceptual continuity.
As light is perceived the image is inverted by the mind. Light encapsulates light, though to the perceiving consciousness there is such a thing as darkness. Within it is unknown.
The "alien" part of the orb phenomena has to do with, perhaps, alternative biology (and by extension of technology) of the process by which the mind functions.
It seems to me the rational mechanism and the intuitive mechanism of cognition are inverse functions. Continuous perception, perhaps, is the utilization of like-terms obtained by factoring and pseudo-squaring, loosely correlated with the metabolic and catabolic processes. As the data set grows, more complex permutations and combinations are discovered/realized, while the necessary intensity of aliveness is commensurate. Intensity selects these as adaptations.
It seems logical that the mind has propriety functions within time dimensions and the body, space. Overlap creates impetus. As the body grasps dilative concepts correspondence to the mind creates a flash of light or various forms of orgone.
Is it so weird to see flashes of light?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orienting_response
'The orienting response (OR), also called orienting reflex, is an organism's immediate response to a change in its environment, when that change is not sudden enough to elicit the startle reflex.'
'The perceiving consciousness makes the determination, not of existence, but of the scope of effects, which may be imaginary or unconscious , if rejected, or real and 'perceptible', if accepted. The biological constraints and determinism, either way, localize the perceptual continuity'
If the body functions energetically why is it strange for the mind to observe the body's energy before the orientating reflexes activates?
'When more people can see auras the gap between 'materialists' and 'spiritualists' will narrow.
Seems to me the gap has to do with this sort of thinking.
'Brain=computer=consciousness is the greatest covert op on the planet.'
https://www.self.com/story/ocular-migraine-facts
"So, let’s talk aura, those sensory changes that can accompany migraines (but don’t always). Aura most often manifest as visual disturbances like seeing flashes of light, zigzagging patterns, blind spots, or shimmering spots or stars, the Mayo Clinic says, and can last for up to an hour"
Considering the difference in ecology, seems natural to me the experience of the orgone would be higher and more variable.
Interesting ALMED experimented to correlate the flashes with cosmic rays. However, the very picture we have of reality is the coalescing of light. This is an exceedingly difficult point for people to consciously grasp. In some people this can be observed during an ocular migraine.
If you can be conscious of how the topology of the mind encapsulates light, what use is the symbol-thought construct?
Humorous article….we will see the overly symbolized complexes people use to navigate their lives become undone and rebound.
' taking action on this reality means orienting this body towards a symbolic representation of something else in this reality.'
as has always been the case
Seems to me basing your perceptions on a time-referent to be as plausible as a spatial one. The combinations become simulations sorted by probability of social constraint and individual tolerance for variance.
Learning to create those biological (orgone) flashes. Just need to create a brief psychosis and orientate yourself to encapsulate it with your bio fields. Seems logical to me that's why words mean things in the first place.
'Discusses the tree of mind an how language evolved'
Now I have some first hand experience with that.
In regards to attempting to convert people, people are psychometrically armored. Some more than others.
Now a lot of people report freezing/missing time when UFO's come close. Masses of people, according to Reich, have pleasure anxiety. We are familiar with the concept of vibrational difference. The experiential difference could be underlying the amount of pleasure desired and the constraints/rejections placed on it. We all live with incentives and understanding of inhibitive necessity. Place two different civilizations with a very different 'sex-economy' (,obviously there's more dimensions than this,) together. The less capitalized and more neurotic reaches a breaking point.
Explains missing time phenomena…somewhat.
"Towards a self-regulating character structure"
Now, what if you could control your orgasm reflex. How would that effect your motivations? Seems like a different type of experience than humanity, thus far, has experienced.
Is it so outlandish to think that if you can control your orgasm, your biology follows? Then, perhaps, the coarser elements of matter?
Why is it there are the rumors humanity is mentally ill compared to ETs?
Why does Reich say all neurosis have a sexual component?
Let's assume there is a synchronous underpinning to reality. Now, the orientating mechanism of conscious perception, perceives a 'realistic' opportunity of attaining some form of satisfaction. What if the orgasm reflex could overcome the inhibitive mechanism such as the perception of pain or dissatisfaction to such a conscious orientation?
Seems to me if there is a synchronous underpinning to reality then doing so is 'butterfly effect' like, considering the individual within larger social conditions.