Anonymous ID: e5eabf Dec. 15, 2018, 4:05 p.m. No.4327115   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4327100

Can somebody put a tiny Guy Fawkes mask on the 'suit' in the white flag…that would be kekking awesome considering what we do here…

 

I make basic memes…this is more graduate level skilz..

Anonymous ID: e5eabf Dec. 15, 2018, 4:22 p.m. No.4327267   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4327228

Not good. I've been involved with using the pedophile's symbols against them long before it was a thing on the internet.

 

This looks spoopy..

Anonymous ID: e5eabf Dec. 15, 2018, 4:42 p.m. No.4327414   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4326984

This IS relevant and IMHO notable. And I do have a graduate degree heavy in statistics. If this data set is legit and we can back this out with and confirm with breads (as a 751 post proxy) then perfectly linear increase in any human activity is seriously non-normal. In fact, modeling or backtesting anything humans do is sloppy at best.

 

I've been on Q from the first week and on here most of that time. This is interesting…very interesting. r = .9966 is damn near a perfect fit.

Anonymous ID: e5eabf Dec. 15, 2018, 4:53 p.m. No.4327510   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4327442

I don't have the dataset…otherwise it'd be pretty straightforward. Don't worry, I can't shake this…now I've got a dig to do…one I'd rather not considering the implications. Hopefully it's a methodological error…