oops
>by asserting Flynn was guilty of the crimes of his associates that were just now indicted–not even a trial yet, not even an indictment of Flynn of those crimes!
Gotta be one of the biggest screwups in recent jurisprudence history.
>Playing devils advocate
That's fair.
>Flynn was doing 'diplomacy' without a FARA while NOT working for the govt (pre-election
Flynn was being sentenced for 1 charge of 'lying to the FBI'. What does FARA have to do with this particular case at all?
>Clinton was literally the sec of state, which is a govt role which implies diplomacy.
While her & her husband's foundation was taking in money from foreign gov'ts and corps.
And while evidence suggests that foundation money was being co-mingled with their personal funds.
Bingo. They got caught flatfooted.