There is no way to verify what you are saying, and what you say could have been applied to any period of time since before Trump took office.
In other words, it's completely worthless emotional driven hope-porn.
You can trust the plan without being retarded.
Honestly that angle is getting pretty stale and illogical.
None of these "mirror" examples are analogous enough to their counterparts to provide any meaning legal precedent.
And although anons can imagine how these situations are acting as propaganda to clear the way for Normies to accept something, it isn't really having remotely that affect either.
Normies don't comprehend 1% of the legal and situational intricacy of any of these events. It doesn't rise above ORANGE MAN BAD to them.
Is he going to rape and sacrifice some children so he has "precedent" to charge them for that too?
It's just extremely lazy to call everything a mirror, everything is for precedent, when that doesn't even make actual sense.
Stop leaning on it.
No anon, that's not why he did it.
He did it so they'd waste all of their time and messaging all the way up to Friday preparing to go to war with him and shut down.
Probably also worrying that they might take heat if it comes down to that.
All the while, POTUS was always planning on funding with the military. He's just pretending he cares about getting this funding to make them dance uncomfortably.
And I'm telling you that your explanation is only valid in your head.
There is almost no normie in the real world that would actually think that way.
When Trump is cleared and they go after the real criminals, they will think one of two things:
Wow, it's about time someone got the Clintons. Oh, Obama is corrupt too? Doesn't surprise me. Fucking Government.
or
-WOW TRUMP WON HE GOT AWAY WITH IT NOW HE IS TURNING THE POWER AGAINST THE SAINTS OF OUR REPUBLIC LETS MARCH IN THE STREETS.
Those are the two wavelengths you are looking at.
No normie needs to see legal precedings handled in a very particular way against a member of Trumps team before they can allow themselves to accept indictments against the cabal.
Cognitive dissonance is allowing you to convince yourself that these people exist, but they don't.
Anyone smart enough to follow precedent and the legal particulars already understands what is happening and would readily accept the cabal crimes when they happen.