>>4362583 lb

I think I concur too. (my hesitancy comes from my ignorance, not from your explanation). Even though I only read the "play-by-play" here, It seemed very apparent to me that the judge was acting suspiciously, and that the 'time-out' was proposed so the judge, himself, could figure out how to wiggle out of this (apparently) surprising posture by Flynn.

My questions:

1. WHY did Flynn agree to the delay? (It seemed like he was chomping at the bit to get sentenced. Now it appears the DS knows the play he was making; I can only imagine he's got an even stronger hand to play by waiting… but I don't understand what that is…)

2. What is the basic process by which Flynn was/is expecting to contribute evidence / testimony after being sentenced? Doesn't sentencing conclude the proceedings? (i.e., isn't the chance to give testimony over upon sentencing?)

>>4363305

interdasting… nice one

>> 4362731

OMG, your shilling is making me feel embarrassed (for you). If you really felt the way you claim, you'd be doing any one of 1,000 things other than posting shill comments in Qresearch.

Shilling now is beneficial to us… the true depth of the shill "investment" is clearer now than it's ever been (to me, at least). Shill away…

kek!

>>4363582