>>4424866

>>4424891

(both LB)

re: anon's excellent javascript

925d71 (LB) was an excellent case study.

I set the post number to 25 fade / 30 hide.

Post 29 was the hideous cock photo, which the blacklist button worked nicely on.

Finally hit 30 and posts disappeared (still there if you hover on replies).

Only downside was you lose your position in the bread but that happens if you filter ID or ID+ anyway. Also the "fade" feature doesn't seem to do anything.

However… I am not as keen on that feature because if it set too low it filters legit anons (potentially including baker, and including the script creator LB, ironically). But if it is set too high it only works near the end of the bread.

I think I will set the filter limit to something outrageous like 200, filter by ID+ based on intuition, and then use the remaining features… and get comfy.

Thanks again for the script, anon!!

>>4425363

Yep. I would expand with, if it's true, and Dershowitz starts to go down, how many does he pull down with him?

>>4425413

I was wondering about # of posts per minute by a specific UID. That's probably tricky to code (said by a non-codefag, maybe it's actually really easy) and might be more difficult to gauge what is acceptable/unacceptable.

>>4425419

Yes, in two ways. See pic.

a) highlights reply

b) highlighted in sidebar at the right of the screen

(the highlighted "you" is not part of the script… from CTRL-F in Firefox)

Not an active notification but does the trick.

>>4425555

Those digits….