>Yes, of course. Not sure Bitcoin was not created to distract from gold.
Imo, crypto has been the attempted replacement currency for at least 5 years now, if not longer behind the scenes. …And I think the real angle is that the whole "crypto vs FRN debate" is a shell game to begin with.
Before I go any further, sure, I understand that FRNs are fiat.
But so are cryptos. So effectively there is no diff..
And, [they] figured out how to game it on top of of this. [They] simply make their own version that is programmed by and benefits [them], while marketing it as the original ideal; While this is happening, [they] cause it to become the "standard" via the comped operatives at the required levels of government, to get it done.
And then simply issue laws illegalizing the organic ones. Many of which are glorified honeypots.
This is why FMSM has sperged about seemingly random choices of the administration at times.
Because [they] have a fair idea of why (even if we don't), and [they] also know telling everyone else why… Would fuck up the game for [themselves.]
Gold standard sounds very fucking attractive. Fixed weight of thing that cannot be forged due to being fiat or worse, non existent without electricity.