Anonymous ID: 2ba2f8 Feb. 22, 2018, 5:19 a.m. No.460545   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0554

>>460504

USA Today made Gannett into a major media player in the 1980s.

They had named skyscrapers in Arlington Virginia.

Basically, Gannett and USA Today have been synonymous for over 30 years.

No digging required into that part of Gannett.

Anonymous ID: 2ba2f8 Feb. 22, 2018, 5:27 a.m. No.460589   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0605 >>0623

>>460554

Right,thats what I'm saying, Gannett owns them and is very well known for it for a long time.

Just so you don't have the idea it's a discovery.

 

Saying "We now know that Gannett owns USA Today" is like saying "we've discovered CNN is behind Headline News". It makes you sound like a retard.

Anonymous ID: 2ba2f8 Feb. 22, 2018, 5:52 a.m. No.460702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0708 >>0901

>>460654

Understood. From the outside looking in, it would be easy to imagine Gannett being tied to the Clowns, intimately. How the fuck are they staying above water in an environment where their industry is dying?

Subsidies of some type would be my guess.

But exposing the information feed to the other outlets will be a challenge. They all operate off the same talking points already.

Re member JournOlist? Nobody really cared and it probably still exists.

Anonymous ID: 2ba2f8 Feb. 22, 2018, 6:03 a.m. No.460752   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0939

>>460706

Really good work.

That Gannett/C_A relationship is very intriguing, it would explain a lot, including why Gannett could be at the center of the comms rather than AP or WAPO or NY Times etc.

Also, if Gannett were getting a few billion a year in govt subsidies, it would explain their curious financial viability.