Since Einstein proved his theory of relativity by the bending of light though space-time,
and,
since Hubbel proved that the speed of light is constant (methods are another topic but let's assume it's fakt)
Doesn't it follow that light has mass since it curves along the gravitational forces?
If light did not have mass, would it not just continue into space without bending? Disregarding the gravitational effects on space-time?
I agree, but many learned doctors would have my ass. Photons have very small mass, they admit, but if light has mass… then the speed of light cannot be constant.
>What if mass could be condensed and focused?
Maybe they'd call it something dumb like Light Amplified by Stimulating Emitting Radiation or something faggy like that?
So, you claim light is somehow proportional to an electronic/magnetic field??
I like it anon… I like it!!
Neber seen dis!!! is there sound waves distorting the light waves?
You're prolly right, I've been drinking.
THIS IS BIG!!! Only sound can make light do that.
Sound has no weight, but it travels in waves. Light has mass but does not travel in waves, so the story goes.
THIS PICTURE (if real) proves that LIGHT MUST HAVE MASS
Freddy is a much better shill than you ebot.
Will do, not my field, I'll neber publish outside of here but it would be noice if one of these MILLENIAL PUKES PICKED UP THE TORCH AND EARNED YOUR KEEP for once.
Hope you're sharing whatever you're smoking over there, but ebot is just random jargon. Freddy put a BANE MASK on a CATS FACE and put it on the fucking MONA fucking LISA.
No, that assumption would blow out Einstein and therefore disrupt the last half century of physics.
These people think a guy walked on water 2000 years ago too.
>Photons (light) only has mass when it is moving.
Sounds dumb at first, but I'm trying the logic.
If weight has weight on earth and isn't moving, it still has weight, but it is moving (accelerating) toward the center of the earth.
In space, no movement… no weight. No weight, no mass.
I see the logic, but light cannot idle, it moves BECAUSE it has weight. The vacuum of space PROVES this does it not? An asteroid can sit motionion-less in the vastness of space, but can a beam of light do the same?
But only things with MASS follow space-time curvature. If light follows the curvature of space-time, then it must have mass.
There's always tomorrow anon.
You have to be the same guy who keeps posting the stupid sword shit song. This movie sucked, I almost made it through the whole thing, gave up at the dumb ass miner. THIS MOVIE SUCKED.
>Higgs field breaks the symmetry to 'create mass'
Slightly familiar with the Higgs Boson, but how it "Breaks symmetry" was not on my reading list. Care to expand? It's not like I can gargle this shit anon.