>>463136

Well, no. They're never going to say that no one died. People died.

The MSM spin is obvious, but they could just be exploiting the event. Their shameless promotion and fakery after the fact doesn't prove anything about the event itself.

The shooting could have been a full blown pre-planned FF, something that the authorities just "let happen," a clandestine operation by a much smaller cell, or a bona fide lone wolf shooting. Nobody really knows.

Suggesting that nobody died isn't going to push people into asking the hard questions. It's going to marginalize those questions when it's easily disproven.

>>463225

>I know you are permitted usually so many tickets per family member for graduations, yet why would her name be printed on someone other grad's ticket for tracking purposes

The "6 # tickets" line at the bottom of the image also strongly implies that the named person is the graduating student, who is allocated a certain number of tickets.

>>463439

I don't get this line of "reasoning." You're willing to believe just about anything by the fucks pulling the strings within the CIA, etc., but you can't believe they'd actually let kids get killed in service to their ends? That they'd go to the trouble and accept the added risk of faking the shooting itself (not only the shooter(s), but somehow fooling everyone about actual bullets and people shot)? You really think they're so squeamish about drawing blood?