Anonymous ID: 2a3411 Jan. 8, 2019, 3:07 a.m. No.4659814   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9920

>>4659806

No need to be transported to Mexico…

>and may even allow for the prescription of deadly drugs outside the state via telemedicine, and by healthcare professionals other than doctors can administer the drugs, without ever having examined the patient in person.

Anonymous ID: 2a3411 Jan. 8, 2019, 3:44 a.m. No.4659945   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4659920

I'm personally in favor of it. I agree with you that an incapacitated person cannot make that decision, but my other half and I have had this discussion many times - we both feel the same way - and our children have been told how we feel. Ending life support is an extremely difficult decision to make and I feel horrible for anyone faced with having to make a call. That's why I support a person being able to take on that decision themselves if they are able in advance of being incapacitated.

Anonymous ID: 2a3411 Jan. 8, 2019, 3:57 a.m. No.4660011   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0033

Has anyone seen this shit? Leave it to CNN.

 

CNN's Don Lemon is worried people will believe Trump's speech on the southern border crisis: "But do you think it should be – I don't know – a delay of some sort, and then you can – because people believe it. Trump will say what he has to say. People will believe it…"

 

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1082514656583856129

Anonymous ID: 2a3411 Jan. 8, 2019, 4:11 a.m. No.4660075   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0090

>>4660055

On this, I'm only speaking of the truth about the need for Border Security. For the deeper truth of all things, well, I think we are here because we are still seeking the answer to that.

Anonymous ID: 2a3411 Jan. 8, 2019, 4:33 a.m. No.4660190   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0218

>>4660139

Anon, wait. Your statement:

>Rubio states it's CONSTITUTIONALLY protected.

is not correct. Rubio was replying to Sanders statement:

>This is the U.S. where boycotting is a right & part of our historical fight for freedom & equality. Maybe a refresher on our U.S. Constitution is in order…

Rubio stated, "And if boycotting #Israel is constitutionally protected…"

Anonymous ID: 2a3411 Jan. 8, 2019, 4:51 a.m. No.4660280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0318 >>0340

>>4660218

And I believe that is Rubio's point. The bill they were arguing about is one that would prevent American businesses from participating in boycotting. Sounds like a no-brainer, right? But throw #Israel into the mix and that's when the shit hits the fan.

Anonymous ID: 2a3411 Jan. 8, 2019, 5:28 a.m. No.4660477   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4660438

Yes, I've dipped into it, and I think there is a very good reason why Q has stated they are saving Israel for last. It will be the culmination of revealing the truth. Personally, I've focused more on the Russiagate, Spygate aspects of our whole movement and confined my research to that. Maybe once that get resolved, I'll start digging toward the endgame.