>>4659838 (pb)

Yeah, they did a whole episode on me where they called me, among other things, a "vicious little cryptofascist," KEK.

See: https://soundcloud.com/qanonanonymous/episode-16-soros-rent-boys-destroy-neon-revolt

But this is what I've been trying to say for a while: they've been busy little bees manufacturing consensus, by basically circling the wagons and vouching for each other's "credibility" in this arena. So View will say something, and Sommer cites View in his next Daily Beast Article. Then Collins turns around and cites Sommer in his next NBC article, and now they're BOTH citing View. And so on, and so forth, until they're all lauding each other as "experts" in "debunking" Q.

This is why I dubbed them the "QManCentipedes" the other day, because all they're doing is manufacturing consensus by regurgitating one another, over and over. And really, their journalistic "standards" are just as disgusting. They consider us "the feeder," but get offended when we point out what they are.

The beauty of this meme is its flexibility. For instance, The anti-Q Hareetz article published yesterday cited View, so it was easy enough to throw that author's image in there, as well.

I've included the template, if anyone wants it, as well.