>>4682215 (lb)
Not sure, but from your comment I'd have to assume you never came across this little piece of research:
Harrit et al: "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009
Naw, thanks. I'm an obvious shill, and I always follow leaders.
Of course, as a shill, I could never admit that the beam inside WTC were not made of steel, and also the melt seen on videos and the USGS satellite infrared picture – I could never admit these were fakes.
Also the firemen finding pools of molten steel under the rubble weeks after the event – I couldn't admit those were "our guys" (i.e. shills).
So you'd better leave me and find someone else for your outlandishly useless attempts to convince.
Oh, yes, talking about it: Earth must be flat, otherwise the buildings would never have fallen straight into their own footprints.