>>4682236 pb
ur a fuckn liar.
One of the perquisites of being here is that no one knows who I am. So fuck off.
This isn't even a Q topic.
>>4682237 pb
Who is "they?"
>>4682250 pb
Can't be ruled out? - as can be the "pancake theory" / destruction by force of gravity.
Now can I get on with enjoying all the good news?!
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ4.html
Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect
John Hutchinson was allegedly discredited. Still that doesn't change the evidence.
You still have to have a answer as to what caused the effects.
Thermite theory was pushed by the fake and controlled official "9/11 Truth Movement"
(It's a meta-slide.)
If you yourself are not a shill I'd suggest you look closer and neglect to follow 9/11 Truth movement leaders. They are all comped.
THE TRUTH ABOUT TRUTHLINGS
THE 9/11 DOUBLETHINK MOVEMENT
http://www.profitrolle.com/slithering.html
About the "dust" being discovered?
The obtained the dust from a Truther
[no chain of custody] which was tested by Steven Jones? WAS NOT OBTAINED CORRECTLY
We are amateurs, remember. Not police.
This is what Mueller should've been doing!
We're all doing Mueller's job FOR NOTHING until Trump came alone
The point about how the Towers behavior was incompatible with the official NIST report was already proved before by Dr. Steven Jones of Brigham Young U. [also involved with discrediting "cold fusion"] a phsics professor, He already proved it.
[NiST actually skirted the issue by not discussing the exact means of destruction, but just implied the mechanism was gravity driven.]
Then Jones claimed "but that's not proof" after he wrote a long paper on the subject covering it from every angle of classic Physics and then claimed that proof [33 pgs worth coincidenta?l] was not proof.
"We need hard evidence"
^^^ That was not true. We already had it all.
But
He was the "authority" claiming we didn't after his paper had just proved it.
Pretty slick
I wish I never had to write about this again.
It is so old news.