Anonymous ID: 5f4cfb Jan. 13, 2019, 5:50 p.m. No.4744933   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4744655

It's not nonsense. These stats are sound. I did my own confirmation analysis and it's accurate and verifiable. I used Q posts as a proxy sample population and the linearity held exactly like the Anon's bread number proxy sample.

 

I suspect there's a minimum post velocity necessary to keep the board from dying out, so inorganic supplements organic to make up the difference.

 

Days and nights that are 'shill heavy' are probably slow organics and filled with 'shill' posts…disagreement generates more traffic than consensus. There's a lot going on here beyond the obvious. The AI is better than folks realize. If not Turing Test, it's damn close.

Anonymous ID: 5f4cfb Jan. 13, 2019, 5:56 p.m. No.4745023   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4744926

You did what I can't, and did it well. I can conduct international scale analyses on a wide range of stuff, but can't keep up with even reading a fast bread, much less cherry picking it and baking on the side. Much respect, Anon. Much indeed! Peace to you.