Any story to share?
Found that way or added?
Is an interesting thought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermajority#Two-thirds_vote
>Two-thirds vote
>A two-thirds vote, when unqualified, means two-thirds or more of the votes cast. This voting basis is equivalent to the number of votes in favor being at least twice the number of votes against. Abstentions and absences are excluded in calculating a two-thirds vote.
>The two-thirds requirement can be qualified to include the entire membership of a body instead of only those present and voting, but such a requirement must be explicitly stated (such as "two-thirds of those members duly elected and sworn"). In this case, abstentions and absences count as votes against the proposal.
>Alternatively, the voting requirement could be specified as "two-thirds of those present", which has the effect of counting abstentions but not absences as votes against the proposal.
Suggests to me that it would be legally feasible.
Might be highly questionable politically though unless a sufficient proportion of pop has been redpilled and mockingbird media has been fully taken care of.
Imagine the optics of congress expelling their own because there enough Ds had been rounded up and were not present.