Lawfare blog
A story from Lawfare blog was recently cited on Qresearch.
Collect, Analyze, and Disseminate.
A big part of analysis is knowing sources and their biases and reliability. Good analysis operations keep files on their sources.
Lawfare blog is the company some of the FBI conspirators, Page and Baker, were talking of moving to.
It seems from a brief look to be a Marxist inspired endeavor.
Probably deserves a dig of its own.
Lawfare blog is about as slanted as Media Matters. and serves as a supposed primary source for media slams on the President.
From comped Wikipedia:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawfare_(blog)
Lawfare is a blog dedicated to national security issues, published by the Lawfare Institute in cooperation with the Brookings Institution. It was started in September 2010 by Benjamin Wittes (author and former editorial writer for The Washington Post), Harvard Law School professor Jack Goldsmith, and University of Texas at Austin law professor Robert Chesney. Goldsmith was the head of the Office of Legal Counsel in the George W. Bush administration's Justice Department, and Chesney served on a detention-policy task force in the Obama administration. Its writers include a large number of law professors, law students, and former George W. Bush and Barack Obama administration officials.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2015/06/08/welcome-to-the-new-lawfare/
Here a Lawfare blog article is reprinted on the Brookings Institution site.
Lawfare blog pages are marked copyright Lawfare Institute.
Lawfare Institute website:
http://lawfareinstitute.com/?page_id=4
About the Institute:
'''Lawfare is the misuse and abuse of law for political and military ends. It is the injunction of the words law and warfare for it is a legal war.
The Lawfare Institute shall be dedicate to lawfare for political purposes.'''
The term lawfare was created in 2001 by US army major General Charles Dunlap, and has been studied ever since in major universities such as Harvard, for example. Lawfare is a powerful weapon for fighting political enemies, combining apparently legal actions and widespread media coverage. The idea is to embarrass the enemy to the point where they become extremely vulnerable to the baseless accusations. once weakened, they lose popular support and any power of reaction….
Some Lawfare blog headlines
https://www.lawfareblog.com/recent
The Soviet Experience in Afghanistan: Getting History Right
Trump thinks the Soviets invaded Afghanistan because of terrorism. The archives tell a different story.
On What Grounds Can the FBI Investigate the President as a Counterintelligence Threat?
Questions about the legal basis for, and prudence of, treating the president as a national security threat.
Why the FBI’s Investigation Into the President Was Unavoidable
Although I find the president’s behavior shocking, I am not shocked, or at least not surprised, at the FBI’s investigative response.
Jim Baker on Counterintelligence
"At its core," Baker writes, counterintelligence "is about spies and the people who try to catch them."
The Lawfare Podcast: Special Edition: The FBI’s Counterintelligence Investigation of Donald Trump
…about the New York Times's report that the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump after the president fired Director James Comey in May 2017.
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell
Between Friday’s New York Times story and other earlier material, we might be in a position to revisit the relationship between the “collusion” and obstruction components of the Mueller investigation.
What Independent Investigations of the Past Can Teach Congress About Its Role in the Mueller Probe
How Robert Mueller Can Write a Report the Justice Department Cannot Suppress