Anonymous ID: f70ab9 Jan. 14, 2019, 9:46 a.m. No.4752012   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2046

>>4751919

 

Are you honestly deluded enough to think that Q's anonymity and safety is reliant on anons "not doxxing him?"

There isn't a single thing anons could possibly do that would endanger Q or the operation in any remote way.

 

We couldn't doxx Q unless Q wanted us to, no matter how hard we try.The reason we don't try to doxx Q is because it's unknowable and therefore functions as a continual slide.

Anonymous ID: f70ab9 Jan. 14, 2019, 9:50 a.m. No.4752051   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2079 >>2096 >>2124

>>4752011

 

Next time something significant happens, is immediately put in notables, then is repeatedly asked about for the next 10 bread, I'll remember that I must be imagining it because this retard said "false"

 

Also, the boot-lickers that rush to defend the idea of notables reveal their own newfaggotry.

The notables rarely, RARELY have anything of any value, and actual autists aren't scared to admit that.

The "i desperately want to be part of the club, so I feverishly follow whatever I perceive to be the rules" crowd of reddit transplants are the ones you see boomer-ing it up during the day time.

Anonymous ID: f70ab9 Jan. 14, 2019, 9:52 a.m. No.4752076   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2086 >>2094 >>2108

>>4752046

 

You didn't read my comment, or at minimum didn't comprehend. Let me try it slower and simpler.

 

>We cannot doxx Q.

>There is a 0% of that happening.

>It's always been a rule because it's a slide.

>It's also a rule because Q is about the information, not authority

>Not because, as you stupidly asserted to OP, that we would endanger someone.

>We do not have the ability to endanger anyone in any way.

>If you believe we do, that is delusion.