baker notable
>>4784213 very
Amen
You posted this before.
If you expect any response you must say what it is, or the circumstances in which it was filmed. Otherwise, there's no relevance and why would anons have an interest?
I wish anons would stop attacking a lawfag.
Why? Well I have listened to this lawfag's words for over a year now and I understand that they left a legal job behind a long time ago because they saw corruption in their field and did not want to be a part of it.
Just like I once had a career at bigcompany but left bigcompany when I realized the nefarious ends to which bigcompany's products could be, or were being, put. It was financially disadvantageous to leave, but it was the right decision.
Likewise lawfag, saw a reason to leave the profession but retains the skills/knowledge, and is now applying them as part of our team of anons/autists.
If you keep picking on lawfag you could lose the opportunity to hear their point of view, which MIGHT just give you insight into how these things work.
Or you could be stupid and decline the opportunity to gain some knowledge you didn't have before. I have a feeling you are going to pick stupid but maybe I am wrong.
Early in this anon's life I knew some young lawfags just out of law school. I was offered the opportunity to go to law school with my education paid for (but there were strings attached … I would have had to be an indentured low-pay employee for a long time). I gave it serious thought but declined. Over time I watched these young lawyers gradually become corrupted by the system. I have seen how the system is correct and how is breaks idealistic young individuals.
So I really salute the lawfag who is on our anons/autists team with us, having endured the corruption and gotten out of it and retaining the skills and applying them in service of OUR cause now.
Don't pick on the lawfag, stupid.