>Constitutionally he's not allowed on the house floor unless invited.
Article and Section please?
Pawn jump the the queen, everyone Jim the queen, kek. Great movie.
Damnit. Everyone jump…
>>4790022 Kek, I’m not.
>The article and section that says that the presidency and the Congress are co-equal branches
Article and Section where this is stated?
You’re stating rules and concepts. To say the President cannot, Constitutionally, go to the House floor is a falsehood. They are 3 equal branches, but show me where the Constitution specifically says that. It doesn’t. But it’s why we have Articles I, II, and III. If you’re going to spout off about the Constitution, know what’s in it. And learn reading comprehension if quoting some history professor.
Thanks for proving my point. “Significant norms and protocols” is not the same as Constitutionally. Words have meanings and language matters.
Exactly. I’m done arguing with that idiot. Dumbasses quoting the Constitution not even knowing what’s in it.
A call to order is a rule. Incentive convened, they’re convened. Constitutional requirement satisfied. It would be a legal pissing match to do, but the authority is there.