>>4793431 (pb)
Not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing with my position that "this all started" only a few years ago, (not 30 years as proposed and agreed by many anons). Agree with your points either way.
Counter theory: Hillary was supposed to be president when she first ran 10 years ago, and was fully intended to win when Obama serendipitously came out of nowhere with a message of "hope" and "change" that gained immense traction quickly. So quickly, that it surprised everyone, and the Cabal put Hillary on hold for 8 years and ran with him instead (since he was another member of the Cabal already, it wasn't a big change for them). I remember when MSM shifted from H to O very clearly. I'm confident the (comped) Nobel Prize was originally supposed to go to her, not him. That's one reason why they never thought she would lose – they had planned it all for SO MANY years by that point (remember the superdelegates-all-for-Hillary problem, for example?). That's why they allowed a dozen candidates, she was supposed to be all the more awesome for beating so many men at once, etc, etc. That was one of their mistakes:
Trump had been wanting to run for president since the 80s as a business ploy (i.e., even if he lost, his bankability would still be much greater than before) and jumped in to the fray. Remember, around that point Bernie Sanders began doing the same thing as Obama – bringing massive crowds which no one expected – and if the Dems had backed him he would have easily won (and Seth Rich would still be alive). But the Cabal was so set on Hillary winning at that point they just began using brute force methods instead of all their elegant planning.
Not sure if Q team approached Trump before or after his decision, to me it's not a material point because I'm sure that it wasn't hard to convince him, as he'd been chafing against the Cabal since at least JFKJR's death. But it was more as a lone wolf billionaire (there are others like him) than as a key figure in a long-term plan.